| 股骨髁上骨折内固定治疗的比较分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘明建,陈岳峰.股骨髁上骨折内固定治疗的比较分析[J].中国医药导报,2009,6(21):33-34. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘明建 陈岳峰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 广东省东莞市石排医院,广东东莞,523330
2. 湖南省泪罗市人民医院,湖南泪罗,414400 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的:探讨股骨髁上骨折两种内固定治疗的效果.方法:对80例股骨髁上骨折患者分别采用2种不同的内固定治疗,逆行带锁髓内钉(GSH)40例,股骨动力髁螺钉(DCS)40例,并进行临床分析.结果:2种内固定方式的骨折愈合率没有统计学差异(P>0.05).2种固定方式的HSS评分显示,DCS优于GSH组,有显著性差异(P<0.05).结论:内固定治疗股骨髁上骨折可获得良好的效果.股骨动力髁螺钉(DCS)可有效治疗股骨远端骨折,具有操作简便、直观、固定牢固等优点.
|
| 关 键 词： | 股骨 骨折 内固定治疗 |
Comparative analysis of supracondylar femur fracture treated with internal fixation |
| |
| LIU Mingjian,CHEN Yuefeng.Comparative analysis of supracondylar femur fracture treated with internal fixation[J].China Medical Herald,2009,6(21):33-34. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Mingjian CHEN Yuefeng |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective: To discuss the clinical effects of supracondylar femur fracture treated with two kinds of internal fixation methods. Methods: 80 cases of supracondylar femor fractures were divided into retrograde interlocking intramedullary nail (GSH) group and femur dynamic condylar screw (DCS) group, 40 cases treated with GSH,another 40 eases treated with DCS, then compared the clinical effects of two groups. Results: Fracture healing rate of two groups had no significant difference (P>0.05). HSS score of DCS group was better than GSH group, the difference was significant (P< 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical effect was good for supracondylar femur fracture treated with internal fixation. DCS is an effective treatment method for distal femoral fractures, it is simple, intuitive, and fixed firmly. |
| |
| Keywords: | Femoral Fractures Fixation |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
