Does circumcision alter the periurethral bacterial flora? |
| |
Authors: | S. S. Wijesinha B. L. Atkins N. E. Dudley P. K. H. Tam |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Pediatric Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK, GB;(2) Department of Microbiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, UK, GB |
| |
Abstract: | A prospective study of 25 boys who underwent circumcision for medical reason was performed. Specimens of periurethral bacterial flora were taken before operation as well as 3 weeks after surgery, so that each boy acted as his own control. Before circumcision, 13 (52%) harboured uropathogenic organisms (Escherichia coli and other coliforms, Enterococcus spp, Proteus spp, Pseudomonas spp, and Klebsiella spp); after circumcision, none of the boys had uropathogens, the only organisms cultured from the periurethral region being skin commensals. We postulate that circumcision converts a ‘cul-de-sac' that is a reservoir of organisms capable of causing ascending urinary tract infection into a surface colonised by natural skin organisms. This study provides circumstantial evidence supporting the idea that circumcision in well-selected patients may confer protection from urine infection. Accepted: 15 March 1997 |
| |
Keywords: | Circumcision Prepuce Urinary infection |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|