首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Cost-effectiveness of maternal immunization against neonatal invasive Group B Streptococcus in the Netherlands
Institution:1. Athena Institute, VU Amsterdam, the Netherlands;2. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Infectious Disease Control (Cib), Bilthoven, the Netherlands;3. Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, the Netherlands;4. Amsterdam UMC, Department of Medical Microbiology, Infection and Immunity, and Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.;5. Amsterdam UMC, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract:BackgroundNeonatal invasive Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection causes considerable disease burden in the Netherlands. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) prevents early-onset disease (EOD), but has no effect on late-onset disease (LOD). A potential maternal GBS vaccine could prevent both EOD and LOD by conferring immunity in neonates.ObjectiveExplore under which circumstances maternal vaccination against GBS would be cost-effective as an addition to, or replacement for the current risk factor-based IAP prevention strategy in the Netherlands.MethodsWe assessed the maximum cost-effective price per dose of a trivalent (serotypes Ia, Ib, and III) and hexavalent (additional serotypes II, IV, and V) GBS vaccine in addition to, or as a replacement for IAP. To project the prevented costs and disease burden, a decision tree model was developed to reflect neonatal GBS disease and long-term health outcomes among a cohort based on 169,836 live births in the Netherlands in 2017.ResultsUnder base-case conditions, maternal immunization with a trivalent vaccine would gain 186 QALYs and prevent more than €3.1 million in health care costs when implemented in addition to IAP. Immunization implemented as a replacement for IAP would gain 88 QALYs compared to the current prevention strategy, prevent €1.5 million in health care costs, and avoid potentially ~ 30,000 IAP administrations. The base-case results correspond to a maximum price of €58 per dose (vaccine + administration costs; using a threshold of €20,000/QALY). Expanding the serotype coverage to a hexavalent vaccine would only have a limited additional impact on the cost-effectiveness in the Netherlands.ConclusionsA maternal GBS vaccine could be cost-effective when implemented in addition to the current risk factor-based IAP prevention strategy in the Netherlands. Discontinuation of IAP would save costs and prevent antibiotic use, however, is projected to lead to a lower health gain compared to vaccination in addition to IAP.
Keywords:Neonatal disease  Cost-effectiveness  Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP)  Maternal Immunization  Vaccine  CSF"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0040"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"cerebrospinal fluid  DALY"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0050"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"disability-adjusted life year  EOD"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0060"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"early-onset disease  GBS"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0070"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "$$":[{"#name":"__text__"  "_":"Group B "}  {"#name":"italic"  "_":"Streptococcus  HUI"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0080"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"Health Utilities Index  IAP"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0090"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis  ICU"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0100"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"intensive care unit  LOD"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0110"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"late-onset disease  NDI"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0120"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"neurodevelopmental impairment  NIP"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0130"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"National Immunisation Programme  NRLBM"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0140"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis  PAID"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0150"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"Practical Application to Include Disease Costs  PROM"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0160"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"prolonged rupture of membranes  QALY"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0170"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"quality-adjusted life year  QoL"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0180"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"quality of life  VE"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0190"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"vaccine effectiveness  WHO"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"k0200"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"World Health Organization
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号