Envelope frequency following responses are stronger for high-pass than low-pass filtered vowels |
| |
Authors: | Frederique J. Vanheusden Michael A. Chesnaye David M. Simpson |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK;2. School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Nottingham, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Background: To assess hearing in response to speech, the envelope frequency following response (FFR) can be observed at the fundamental frequency of a vowel stimulus and its harmonics. FFRs are complex non-linear phenomena, which require better understanding for allowing robust inferences on the assessment of hearing and hearing aid fitting.Objectives: To evaluate the effect of stimulus bandwidth on FFR detection rates using filtered vowel stimuli with equal sound levels.Design: FFRs were collected whilst presenting repeated vowels (in consonant-vowel-consonant format) filtered into different bandwidths. Eighty stimuli per word were presented at 70?dB SPL LAeq through insert earphones with an inter-stimulus interval of 1?s. Responses were detected using frequency-domain Hotelling's T2 (HT2) tests for individual multiples of the fundamental frequency (F0) and for combinations of F0 multiples.Study sample: A total of 11 native English-speaking subjects with normal hearing thresholds.Results: Average detection rates are highest (69%) with stimuli high-pass filtered >1000?Hz, and significantly lower for low-pass filtered stimuli (40%).Conclusions: High-pass filtered vowels therefore appear to elicit stronger FFRs than low-pass filtered vowels at the same dB SPL LAeq. For testing hearing using band-limited speech, filtering effects (due to hearing loss, hearing aid setting or stimulus choice) on responses must be considered. |
| |
Keywords: | Electrophysiology adult or general hearing screening speech perception envelope frequency following responses objective response detection Hotelling’s T2 |
|
|