首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

3组治疗胎儿宫内生长迟缓的药物经济学分析
引用本文:郑彩虹. 3组治疗胎儿宫内生长迟缓的药物经济学分析[J]. 中国药房, 1999, 10(5): 214-215
作者姓名:郑彩虹
作者单位:浙江医科大学附属妇产科医院药剂科!杭州市,310006
摘    要:
目的:运用药物经济学分析方法比较3组治疗胎儿宫内发育迟缓(IUGR)的药物,为有限的医疗费用分配提供依据。方法:60例患IUGR孕妇分3组治疗:能量合剂十三方氨基酸胶囊组(A组)、能量合剂+复方氨基酸注射液组(B组)、能量合剂+复方氨基酸胶囊+10%脂肪乳剂组(C组),分别进行药物经济学及敏感度分析。结果:A、B、C3组费用-效果比(元)分别为156.85、253.93、257.82。由敏感度分析费用-效果比(元)分别为154.05、240.15、234.13。结论:A组治疗方案最经济有效。

关 键 词:胎儿宫内发育迟缓  药物经济学  分析

Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of three Therapeutic Schemes for Intrauterine Growth Retardation
ZHENG Caihong. Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of three Therapeutic Schemes for Intrauterine Growth Retardation[J]. China Pharmacy, 1999, 10(5): 214-215
Authors:ZHENG Caihong
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: Three different therapeutic schemes for intrauterine growth retardation(IUGR) were compared bypharmacoeconomic analysis to afford a scientific basis for assignment of our little medical cost. METHODS: 60 pregnant womenwith IUGR were treated by one of the three schemes: the energy mixture injection and oral amino acid capsules(A); the energymixture injection and compound amino acid injection(B); the energy mixture injection, oral amino acid capsules and 10% fatemulsion(C). They all were analyzed with pharmacoeconomics and sensitivity. RESULTS:The cost--effectiveness ratios of A,B, C were 156. 85. 253. 93. 257. 82 yuan, respectively. They became 154. 05. 240. 15 and 234. 13 yuan by sensitivity. CONCLUSION:The "A" scheme was the most effective and inexpensive one.
Keywords:intrauterine growth retardation  pharmacoeconomics  analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号