首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


The minimal important difference of the ICU mobility scale
Authors:Claire J Tipping  Anne E Holland  Meg Harrold  Tom Crawford  Nick Halliburton  Carol L Hodgson
Abstract:

Background

The intensive care unit mobility scale (IMS) is reliable, valid and responsive. Establishing the minimal important difference (MID) of the IMS is important in order to detect clinically significant changes in mobilization.

Objective

To calculate the MID of the IMS in intensive care unit patients.

Methods

Prospective multi center observational study. The IMS was collected from admission and discharge physiotherapy assessments. To calculate the MID we used; anchor based methods (global rating of change) and two distribution-based methods (standard error of the mean and effect size).

Results

We enrolled 184 adult patients; mean age 62.0 years, surgical, trauma, and medical. Anchor based methods gave a MID of 3 with area under the curve 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.97). The two distribution based methods gave a MID between 0.89 and 1.40.

Conclusion

These data increase our understanding of the clinimetric properties of the IMS, improving its utility for clinical practice and research.
Keywords:Intensive care unit  Outcome measures  Clinimetric properties  ICU mobility scale  Rehabilitation  GRC  global rating of change  ICU  intensive care unit  IMS  intensive care unit mobility scale  MID  minimal important difference  SEM  standard error of the mean
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号