The efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with three or more comorbidities |
| |
Authors: | Yukio Naya Toyofusa Tobe Takahito Suyama Kazuhiro Araki Akira Komiya Hiroyoshi Suzuki Tatsuo Igarashi Tomohiko Ichikawa |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Research Center for Frontier Medical Engineering, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan. yu7ki@aol.com |
| |
Abstract: | OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic surgery for kidney treatment is a common procedure. However, the efficacy of this procedure in patients with several comorbidities has not been well investigated. We conducted a retrospective comparison of results of laparoscopic surgery between patients with several comorbidities and patients with no comorbidity to access the efficacy and safety of this procedure. METHODS: The subjects were 20 patients with three or more comorbidities (group A) and 46 patients with less than three comorbidities (group B). These 66 patients were 48 men and 18 women with a mean age of 62.3 years (age range, 24-83 years). The data from these two groups were compared for American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status score, previous surgical history, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, tumor size, complications during and after surgery, conversion rates, time to oral intake, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The initial ASA score and age were significantly higher for the patients with comorbidities (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0008, respectively). All other variables before, during, and after surgery were similar for both laparoscopic groups. However, the incidence of atelectasis of laparoscopy was higher than that of open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy for patients with comorbidities is safe and minimally invasive. Further investigation to prevent atelectasis is necessary. |
| |
Keywords: | comorbidities laparoscopy radical nephrectomy |
|
|