|
|||||
|
|
| 左室急性心肌梗死后急诊介入治疗与择期介入治疗的对比分析 | |
| 引用本文： | 郭旭昌,钟淑琼,管健. 左室急性心肌梗死后急诊介入治疗与择期介入治疗的对比分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2013, 0(19): 418-419 |
| 作者姓名： | 郭旭昌 钟淑琼 管健 |
| 作者单位： | 广东省东莞市常平医院急诊科,广东 东莞,523573 |
| 摘 要： | 目的探讨并对比左室急性心肌梗死后急诊介入治疗与择期介入治疗的疗效。方法将在我科治疗的120名左室急性心肌梗死患者分为2组,急诊组60例进行急诊PCI,择期组60例择期PCI手术治疗。观察手术效果和术后并发症等临床指标。结果急诊组痊愈率88.3%,优于常规组65.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论急诊介入治疗在左室急性心肌梗死治疗中比择期介入治疗更有效。 |
| 关 键 词： | 心肌梗死 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 择期 |
PCI Comparative Analysis of Left Yentricular Acute Myocardial Infarction after Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Elective Interventional Treatment |
|
| GUO Xu-chang , ZHONG Shu-qiong , GUAN Jian. PCI Comparative Analysis of Left Yentricular Acute Myocardial Infarction after Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Elective Interventional Treatment[J]. Guide of China Medicine, 2013, 0(19): 418-419 | |
| Authors: | GUO Xu-chang ZHONG Shu-qiong GUAN Jian |
| Affiliation: | (Department of Emergency, Changping Hospital of Dongguan, Dongguan 523573, China) |
| Abstract: | Objective To investigate and compare the efficacy of left ventricular acute myocardial infarction after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention and elective interventional treatment. Methods In our department treated 120 lett ventricular acute myocardial infarction were divided into two groups, emergency group of 60 patients, emergency PCI, elective group of 60 patients undergoing elective PCI surgical treatment. Observe the effect of surgery and post-operative complications, such as clinical indicators. Results Emergency group cure rate of 88.3%, 65.0% better than the conventional group, the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The emergency intervention more effectively than elective interventional treatment of left ventricular acute myocardial infarction. |
| Keywords: | Myocardial infarction Percutaneous coronary intervention Elective |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |