首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

经尿道前列腺电汽化术联合经尿道前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生症
引用本文:傅光华,陈善勤,李健,赖建平.经尿道前列腺电汽化术联合经尿道前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生症[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(3):283-284,287.
作者姓名:傅光华  陈善勤  李健  赖建平
作者单位:四川省宜宾市第一人民医院,泌尿外科,四川,宜宾,644000
摘    要:目的总结经尿道前列腺电汽化术结合经尿道前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生症的临床意义。方法回顾性分析540例经尿道前列腺电汽化术加电切术治疗的前列腺增生症患者的临床资料。结果536例患者手术成功,最大尿流率17.3-21.2mL/s,平均最大尿流率18.3mL/s,IPSS评分7-14分,平均7.2分。无尿失禁和死亡病例。结论经尿道前列腺电汽化术加经尿道前列腺电切术治疗前列腺增生症出血少,经尿道手术综合征减少;手术创面光整,减少腺体组织残留,利于术后创面愈合。

关 键 词:前列腺增生症  经尿道汽前列腺电化术  经尿道前列腺电切术
文章编号:1007-1989(2005)03-0283-03

TUVP and TURP for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
Fu Guang-hua,CHEN Shan-qin,LI Jian,LAI Jian-ping.TUVP and TURP for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].China Journal of Endoscopy,2005,11(3):283-284,287.
Authors:Fu Guang-hua  CHEN Shan-qin  LI Jian  LAI Jian-ping
Abstract:To summarize the clinical significance of the TUVP and TURP in the treatment of BPH. Retrospectively analyzing the date of 540 cases of BPH who underwent TUVP and TURP treatment. 536 cases of them were operated successfully. Uroflow rate(Qmax) was 17.3~21.2 mL/s. The mean peak uroflow rate(Qmax) was 18.3 mL/s. IPSS score was 7 to 14, the average was 7.2. There was no urinary incontinence and death in this group. Conclusions] Compared with single TUVP, the advantages of TUVP and TUTP lie in: bleeding and TURS decrease. The surface of wound become smooth, TUVP and TURP decrease the remains of glandulae, and facilitate the heal of wound surface.
Keywords:prostatic hyperplasia  transurethral vaporization of the prostate  transurethral resection of the prostate  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号