| 三种空气细菌采样方法的采样结果比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 方大春,吴晓明.三种空气细菌采样方法的采样结果比较[J].中国消毒学杂志,2001,18(3):193-195. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 方大春 吴晓明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 安徽省马鞍山市疾病预防控制中心
2. 安徽省马鞍山市卫生监督所 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为了解３种空气细菌采样方法的差别，在医院同一室内，同步进行３种方法采样。结果，消毒前空气细菌总数较多，ＪＷＬ—ⅡＡ型空气采样器所采菌数较少，Ｐｏｔｏｎ空气采样器者次之，平板自然沉降所采菌数较多；消毒后空气细菌总数减少，Ｐｏｔｏｎ空气采样器所采菌数较少，平板自然沉降所采菌数仍较多。Ｐｏｔｏｎ空气采样器所采菌量，随着空气细菌总数增多而接近或超过ＪＷＬ—ⅡＡ型空气采样器者。
|
| 关 键 词： | 医院消毒 空气消毒 空气采样 平板沉降法 JWL-ⅡA型空气采样器 Poton空气采样器 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000年9月19日 |
COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF SAMPLING BY THREE AIRBACTERIA SAMPLING METHODS |
| |
| Fang Dachun Wu Xiaoming.COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF SAMPLING BY THREE AIRBACTERIA SAMPLING METHODS[J].Chinese Journal of Disinfection,2001,18(3):193-195. |
| |
| Authors: | Fang Dachun Wu Xiaoming |
| |
| Abstract: | In order to know the difference of 3 air bacteria sampling methods, synchronous sam- pling by 3 methods was carried out in a same room of a hospital. The results showed that the total bacterial count of air was high before disinfection and the number of bacteria collected was small by JWL-Ⅱ A-type air sampler, next by Poton air sampler and large by plate natu- ral sedimentation. After disinfection, the total bacterial count of air decreased and the number of bacteria collected was small by Poton air sampler and still large by plate natural sedimentation. The number of bacteria collected by Poton air sampler approximated or ex- ceeded that collected by JWL-Ⅱ A-type air sampler with increase in total bacterial count of air. |
| |
| Keywords: | hospital disinfection air disinfection air sampling plate sedimentation method JWL-Ⅱ A-type air sampler Poton air sampler |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
