首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Remote intervention engagement and outcomes in the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation in Children consortium multisite trial
Authors:Sarah Duncan-Park  Claire Dunphy  Jacqueline Becker  Christine D’Urso  Rachel Annunziato  Joshua Blatter  Carol Conrad  Samuel B. Goldfarb  Don Hayes Jr.  Ernestina Melicoff  Marc Schecter  Gary Visner  Brian Armstrong  Hyunsook Chin  Karen Kesler  Nikki M. Williams  Jonah N. Odim  Stuart C. Sweet  Lara Danziger-Isakov  Eyal Shemesh
Affiliation:1. Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Kravis Children’s Hospital, New York, New York, USA;2. Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Kravis Children’s Hospital, New York, New York, USA

Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, New York, USA;3. Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA;4. Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital, Palo Alto, California, USA;5. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;6. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA;7. Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA;8. Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;9. Rho Inc, Durham, North Carolina, USA;10. National Institutes of Health, NIAID, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Abstract:
Remote interventions are increasingly used in transplant medicine but have rarely been rigorously evaluated. We investigated a remote intervention targeting immunosuppressant management in pediatric lung transplant recipients. Patients were recruited from a larger multisite trial if they had a Medication Level Variability Index (MLVI) ≥2.0, indicating worrisome tacrolimus level fluctuation. The manualized intervention included three weekly phone calls and regular follow-up calls. A comparison group included patients who met enrollment criteria after the subprotocol ended. Outcomes were defined before the intent-to-treat analysis. Feasibility was defined as ≥50% of participants completing the weekly calls. MLVI was compared pre- and 180 days postenrollment and between intervention and comparison groups. Of 18 eligible patients, 15 enrolled. Seven additional patients served as the comparison. Seventy-five percent of participants completed ≥3 weekly calls; average time on protocol was 257.7 days. Average intervention group MLVI was significantly lower (indicating improved blood level stability) at 180 days postenrollment (2.9 ± 1.29) compared with pre-enrollment (4.6 ± 2.10), = .02. At 180 days, MLVI decreased by 1.6 points in the intervention group but increased by 0.6 in the comparison group (= .054). Participants successfully engaged in a long-term remote intervention, and their medication blood levels stabilized. NCT02266888.
Keywords:clinical research/practice  compliance/adherence  immunosuppressant  pediatrics  social sciences
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号