The impact of the prevention strategies on the indirect effects of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients |
| |
Authors: | Antonio Roman Nicolás Manito Josep Maria Campistol Valentín Cuervas-Mons Luis Almenar Manuel Arias Fernando Casafont Domingo del Castillo María G. Crespo-Leiro Juan F. Delgado J. Ignacio Herrero Paloma Jara José M. Morales Mercedes Navarro Federico Oppenheimer Martín Prieto Luis A. Pulpón Antoni Rimola Piedad Ussetti |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Hospital Vall d''Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain;2. Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain;3. Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain;4. Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain;5. Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain;6. Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain;7. Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain;8. Complejo Universitario A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain;9. Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain;10. Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain;11. Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain |
| |
Abstract: | Transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy are at increased risk of active cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease. Without appropriate prophylaxis, as many as 80% of solid organ transplant recipients may experience CMV infection. In addition to the direct effects of CMV, infection may be associated with a range of indirect effects, including an increase in risk of other infections, as well as a higher incidence of rejection, graft loss and death. The indirect effects of CMV infection can vary depending on the transplanted organ. For example, CMV-infected kidney transplant recipients may be at increased risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes, while CMV infection in liver transplant recipients may potentiate hepatitis C infection and increase the risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. Indirect effects result from a number of pathological processes, including immune modulation and immunosuppression, generation of cytotoxic, pro-inflammatory responses, and smooth muscle proliferation. Prophylactic treatment with antiviral medication can reduce the risk of CMV disease, thereby improving graft survival and overall outcomes, particularly in kidney and heart transplant recipients. Antiviral prophylaxis should be considered for all patients at risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation. In this paper we review the main indirect effects of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients, and the impact of CMV prophylaxis on these effects. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|