首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

进口加拿大流行性感冒裂解疫苗临床安全性与免疫原性评价
引用本文:胡月梅,方捍华,高桂华,张雪峰,张艺飓,朱石炜,朱凤才.进口加拿大流行性感冒裂解疫苗临床安全性与免疫原性评价[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(7):503-506.
作者姓名:胡月梅  方捍华  高桂华  张雪峰  张艺飓  朱石炜  朱凤才
作者单位:1. 210009,南京,江苏省疾病预防控制中心
2. 中国药品生物制品研究所
3. 江苏省阜宁县疾病预防控制中心
摘    要:目的 评价加拿大Shire公司生产的流行性感冒(流感)裂解疫苗的安全性和免疫原性。方法 按整群随机抽样原则,以进口同类疫苗作为对照开展现场临床试验;比较两种流感疫苗免疫后临床反应率、抗体阳转率、保护率及几何平均滴度(GMT)。结果 试验组发热反应率(3.69%)及局部反应率(1.75%)与对照组相比较,两组间差异无统计学意义。试验组、对照组免疫后H1N1、H3N2、B型抗体阳转率分别为96.8%、95.8%、52.3%和92.3%、90.2%、62.3%;结果显示两种流感疫苗间阳转率差异有统计学意义。试验组和对照组的H1N1、H3N2及B(亚)型抗体GMT平均增长倍数分别为22.4、16.8、8.2倍和21.2、12.5、7.4倍;试验组免疫后H1N1、H3N2、B型抗体保护率(99%、99%、53.9%)与对照组免疫后三型保护率(96.2%、98.4%、62.3%)差异无统计学意义。结论 加拿大Shire公司生产的流感裂解疫苗发热反应和局部反应与进口同类疫苗无差异,临床安全性良好;免疫后抗体阳转率较高,抗体滴度上升幅度较大,具有良好的免疫原性。

关 键 词:临床安全性  免疫原性  裂解疫苗  加拿大  进口  几何平均滴度(GMT)  流行性感冒(流感)  抗体阳转率  整群随机抽样  H1N1  H3N2  流感疫苗  免疫后  发热反应率  抗体GMT  抗体保护率  对照组  统计学  临床试验  局部反应  抗体滴度  组间差
收稿时间:2004/8/25 0:00:00
修稿时间:2004年8月25日

Evaluation on the safety and immunogenicity of Canada split influenza virus vaccine
HU Yue-mei,FANG Han-hu,GAO Gui-hu,ZHANG Xue-feng,ZHANG Yi-ju,ZHU Shi-wei and ZHU Feng-cai.Evaluation on the safety and immunogenicity of Canada split influenza virus vaccine[J].Chinese Journal of Epidemiology,2005,26(7):503-506.
Authors:HU Yue-mei  FANG Han-hu  GAO Gui-hu  ZHANG Xue-feng  ZHANG Yi-ju  ZHU Shi-wei and ZHU Feng-cai
Institution:Jiangsu Provincial Center of Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing 210009, China.
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of Canada split influenza virus vaccine. METHODS: Cluster samples were by randomly chosen and divided into split vaccination group and homoimported influenza vaccination group. RESULTS: After injection, fever-reaction and local reaction rates of 'trial' group were found as 3.69% and 1.75% respectively, but no statistical significance was found when compared with 'control' group. However the antibody positive rates of 'trail' and 'control' groupsappeared statistically significant (H1N1: 96.8% vs. 92.3%, H3N2: 95.8% vs. 90.2%, B: 52.3% vs. 62.3%). For geometric mean titer (GMT) of type H1N1, H3H2 and B antibody, 'trial' group and 'control' group increased 22.4, 16.8, 8.2 and 21.2, 12.5 and 7.4 times respectively. The antibody protective rates of type H1N1, H3N2 and B were 99%, 99% and 53.9% for 'trial' group, and 96.2%, 98.4% and 62.3% for 'control' but with no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Influenza split vaccine made in Shire company in Canada was safe and with good immunogenicity.
Keywords:Split influenza virus vaccine  Safety  Immunogenicity
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号