Arterial endofibrosis in endurance athletes: Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography and computed tomography angiography |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Service de radiologie urinaire et vasculaire, Hôpital Edouard-Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pavillon B, 5, place d’Arsonval, 69437 Lyon cedex 03, France;2. Faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 69003 Lyon, France;3. Service de chirurgie vasculaire, Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France;4. Service de physique médicale et radioprotection, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France;5. Norimagerie, 69300 Caluire et Cuire, France;6. Service de radiologie, Centre hospitalier de Mâcon, 71018 Mâcon, France;7. Service de biostatistique-bioinformatique, Pôle santé publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69003 Lyon, France;8. CNRS, UMR 5558, équipe biostatistiques santé, laboratoire de biométrie et biologie évolutive, 69100 Villeurbanne, France |
| |
Abstract: | PurposeTo prospectively compare the diagnostic capabilities of computed tomography angiography (CTA) to those of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in endurance athletes with suspicion of arterial endofibrosis.Materials and methodsForty-five athletes (39 men, 6 women; median age: 30 years, interquartile range: 23–42 years) prospectively underwent DSA and CTA without (n = 5) or with (n = 40) electrocardiogram gating. DSA was interpreted by a single expert (experience of 15 years). CTA was independently interpreted by three other readers (experience of 5–8 years). Readers assessed the presence and degree of stenoses on iliac and femoral arteries and the overall diagnosis (negative, uncertain, positive) of endofibrosis at the limb level. Sensitivities and specificities of DSA and CTA were estimated at the limb level using histological findings and long-term follow-up as reference, and compared using the McNemar test.ResultsFor diagnosing and quantifying stenoses, concordance between DSA and CTA was moderate-to-good for common and external iliac arteries, moderate for lateral circumflex arteries and poor-to-moderate for the other branches of the deep femoral artery. It was good for all readers for the overall diagnosis of endofibrosis. After long-term follow-up (median, 95 months; interquartile range: 7–109 months), DSA sensitivity and specificity were respectively 88.6% (39/44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 76–95%) and 75% (24/32; 95% CI: 57.9–86.7%); CTA sensitivity and specificity were respectively 88.6% (39/44; 95% CI: 76–95%; P > 0.99) and 84.4% (27/32; 95% CI: 68.2–93.1%; P = 0.51), 86.3% (38/44; 95% CI: 73.3–93.6%; P > 0.99) and 75% (24/32; 95% CI: 57.9–86.7%; P > 0.99), and 84.1% (37/44; 95% CI: 70.6–92.1%; P = 0.68) and 75% (24/32; 95% CI: 57.9–86.7%; P > 0.99) for the three readers.ConclusionCTA shows performances similar to those of DSA in predicting the long-term diagnosis of endofibrosis in endurance athletes with suggestive symptoms. |
| |
Keywords: | Computed tomography angiography Digital subtraction angiography Iliac arteries Athletes Athletic injuries ABPI" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kw0035" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Ankle-brachial pressure index CCC" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kw0045" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Coefficient of correlation concordance CI" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kw0055" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Confidence interval CIA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kw0065" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Common iliac artery CTA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kw0075" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Computed tomography angiography DAP" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kw0085" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Dose area product DSA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kw0095" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Digital subtraction angiography DLP" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kw0105" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Dose length product ECG" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kw0115" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Electrocardiogram EIA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kw0125" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" External iliac artery IQR" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kw0135" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Interquartile ranges LCA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kw0145" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Lateral circumflex artery SD" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kw0155" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Standard deviation |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|