首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Thromboprophylaxis use and concordance with guidelines among medical and surgical patients in Morocco
Authors:Tazi Mezalek Zoubida  Abderahim Azzouzi  Wafaa Bono  Rajae Tachinante  Mamoun Faroudy  Lamiaa Essaadouni  Chakib Nejjari
Affiliation:1. Internal Medicine Department, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco;2. Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco;3. Internal Medicine Department, Hassan II University Hospital, Fez, Morocco;4. Intensive Care Unit – Maternity, Souissi Maternity, Rabat, Morocco;5. Emergency Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco;6. Internal Medicine Department, Ibn Tofail University Hospital, Marrakech, Morocco;g Epidemiology and Clinical Research Department, Hassan II University Hospital, Fez, Morocco
Abstract:

Introduction

No data are available on thromboprophylaxis use in Morocco. Our aim was to characterize patients at risk of venous thromboembolism and assess the rate of appropriate thromboprophylaxis.

Materials and Methods

This was a national, observational, multicentre survey of venous thromboembolism risk and thromboprophylaxis use in hospitalized patients. Data were collected on a predefined date in three university hospitals in Morocco using a standardized pre-printed form. Thromboembolic risk was assessed according to the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) 2008 guidelines. Patients were classified as “thromboprophylaxis indicated” or “thromboprophylaxis not indicated”.

Results

784 patients were analysed: 307 (39.2%) medical and 477 (60.8%) surgical. 421 (53.7%) were female. Medical patients were older than surgical patients (57.6 ± 11.5 vs. 46.2 ± 16.9 years, p < 0.0001) and were more likely to have risk factors for thromboembolism (50.5% vs. 45.7% of patients, p = NS). 57% of patients without contraindications or bleeding risk were at risk of thromboembolism according to ACCP guidelines and thromboprophylaxis was prescribed to 42.8% of these patients. In contrast, 7.4% of patients with no thromboembolic risk also received thromboprophylaxis (proportion agreement: 61.0%; Kappa = 0.296). Over half (54.5%) of medical patients at risk of thromboembolism did not receive thromboprophylaxis whereas 6.3% of those with no risk did receive it (proportion agreement: 76.4%; Kappa = 0.433). These figures were 57.9% and 9.2%, respectively, for surgical patients (proportion agreement: 52.7%; Kappa = 0.191). Thromboprophylaxis was given to 19.2% of patients with contraindications or a bleeding risk.

Conclusions

Educational initiatives are imperative to inform doctors about appropriate thromboprophylaxis.
Keywords:ACCP, American College of Chest Physicians   LMWH, low molecular weight heparin   PE, pulmonary embolism   TP, thromboprophylaxis   VTE, venous thromboembolism
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号