Racial differences in the familial aggregation of breast cancer and other female cancers |
| |
Authors: | Michael S. Simon Jeannette F. Korczak Cecilia L. Yee Janet R. Daling Kathleen E. Malone Leslie Bernstein Polly A. Marchbanks Suzanne G. Folger Jill A. McDonald Sandra A. Norman Brian L. Strom Dennis Deapen Giske Ursin Ronald T. Burkman Michael F. Press Ann G. Schwartz Robert Spirtas |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Division of Haematology and Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R, 4221 Hudson, Weber Cancer Research Building, Detroit, M1 48201, USA;(2) Division of Epidemiology, Karmanos Cancer Institute at Wayne State University, Detroit, MI;(3) Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle;(4) School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA;(5) Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA;(6) Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA;(7) Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA;(8) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA;(9) Contraception and Reproductive Health Branch, Center for Population Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Summary Although breast cancer familial aggregation has been studied in Caucasians, information for African–Americans is scant. We used family cancer history from the Womens Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences study to assess the aggregation of breast and gynecological cancers in African–American and Caucasian families. Information was available on 41,825 first and second-degree relatives of Caucasian and 28,956 relatives of African–American participants. We used a cohort approach in which the relatives cancer status was the outcome in unconditional logistic regression and adjusted for correlated data using generalized estimating equations. Race-specific models included a family history indicator, the relatives age, and type. Relative risk (RR) estimates for breast cancer were highest for first-degree relatives, and the overall RR for breast cancer among case relatives was 1.96 (95% CI = 1.68–2.30) for Caucasian and 1.78 (95% CI = 1.41–2.25) for African–Americans. The effect of CARE participants reference age on their relatives breast cancer risk was greatest among first-degree relatives of African–American patients with RRs (95% CI) for ages <45 and 45 of 2.97 (1.86–4.74) and 1.48 (1.14–1.92), respectively. Among Caucasians, first-degree relatives of case subjects were at greater risk for ovarian cancer, particularly relatives younger than 45 years (RR (95% CI) = 2.06 (1.02–4.12)), whereas African–American first-degree relatives of case subjects were at increased cervical cancer risk (RR (95% CI) = 2.17 (1.22–3.85). In conclusion, these racially distinct aggregation patterns may reflect different modes of inheritance and/or environmental factors that impact cancer risk.*The first two authors contributed equally to this work. |
| |
Keywords: | African– American case-control study Caucasian epidemiology familial clustering familial risk gynecological cancers. |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|