首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Racial differences in the familial aggregation of breast cancer and other female cancers
Authors:Michael S. Simon  Jeannette F. Korczak  Cecilia L. Yee  Janet R. Daling  Kathleen E. Malone  Leslie Bernstein  Polly A. Marchbanks  Suzanne G. Folger  Jill A. McDonald  Sandra A. Norman  Brian L. Strom  Dennis Deapen  Giske Ursin  Ronald T. Burkman  Michael F. Press  Ann G. Schwartz  Robert Spirtas
Affiliation:(1) Division of Haematology and Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R, 4221 Hudson, Weber Cancer Research Building, Detroit, M1 48201, USA;(2) Division of Epidemiology, Karmanos Cancer Institute at Wayne State University, Detroit, MI;(3) Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle;(4) School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA;(5) Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA;(6) Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA;(7) Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA;(8) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA;(9) Contraception and Reproductive Health Branch, Center for Population Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA
Abstract:Summary Although breast cancer familial aggregation has been studied in Caucasians, information for African–Americans is scant. We used family cancer history from the Womenrsquos Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences study to assess the aggregation of breast and gynecological cancers in African–American and Caucasian families. Information was available on 41,825 first and second-degree relatives of Caucasian and 28,956 relatives of African–American participants. We used a cohort approach in which the relativersquos cancer status was the outcome in unconditional logistic regression and adjusted for correlated data using generalized estimating equations. Race-specific models included a family history indicator, the relativersquos age, and type. Relative risk (RR) estimates for breast cancer were highest for first-degree relatives, and the overall RR for breast cancer among case relatives was 1.96 (95% CI = 1.68–2.30) for Caucasian and 1.78 (95% CI = 1.41–2.25) for African–Americans. The effect of CARE participantsrsquo reference age on their relativesrsquo breast cancer risk was greatest among first-degree relatives of African–American patients with RRs (95% CI) for ages <45 and ge45 of 2.97 (1.86–4.74) and 1.48 (1.14–1.92), respectively. Among Caucasians, first-degree relatives of case subjects were at greater risk for ovarian cancer, particularly relatives younger than 45 years (RR (95% CI) = 2.06 (1.02–4.12)), whereas African–American first-degree relatives of case subjects were at increased cervical cancer risk (RR (95% CI) = 2.17 (1.22–3.85). In conclusion, these racially distinct aggregation patterns may reflect different modes of inheritance and/or environmental factors that impact cancer risk.*The first two authors contributed equally to this work.
Keywords:African–  American  case-control study  Caucasian  epidemiology  familial clustering  familial risk  gynecological cancers.
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号