Physiologic and pharmacologic approaches to spasticity |
| |
Authors: | R R Young |
| |
Affiliation: | Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. |
| |
Abstract: | The term spasticity is used to describe many relatively unrelated syndromes and, because they share few common pathophysiologic mechanisms, it is not possible to define the physiology or pharmacology of spasticity. In patients with spastic paresis, it is the latter negative symptom (rather than the spasticity) that accounts for almost all the functional disability. Clinical neurophysiologic techniques are useful for categorization of patients with clinically identical syndromes into subgroups which respond to different therapies. Fusimotor or spindle primary afferent hyperactivity have not been demonstrated in spastic patients; reduction in central inhibitory mechanisms probably accounts for spastic hyper-reflexia. Increased passive muscle stiffness may also be clinically significant. Therapies for spasticity include elimination of causative or enhancing factors, frequent muscle stretching, surgical approaches and chemotherapy. The latter includes dantrolene (which weakens muscles), baclofen (particularly useful for reduction of flexor spasms and flexor dystonia in patients with spinal lesions) and diazepam. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|