直升机救援在创伤救治中的有效性与可行性研究

目的探究直升机救援在创伤救治中的有效性与可行性。 方法本研究以2016年1月至2018年9月惠州市三级以上医院进行创伤救治的132例患者作为研究对象，其中男性68例，女性64例；年龄18～60周岁，平均年龄(32.94±5.31)岁。按照随机数字表法将其分为观察组和对照组，观察组49例，接受直升机救援；对照组83例，接受地面救援。接到急救电话后，观察组实施直升机救援，对照组实施地面救援，于救援地进行紧急处理后送往就近医院根据患者实际情况实施抢救。比较两组患者病死率、严重后遗症发生率、救援相关时间。 结果观察组病死率(6.12%)、严重后遗症(14.29%)发生率均低于对照组(21.97%、31.06%)，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组出发时间(13.26±2.83) min]长于对照组的(6.34±1.09 )min]，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组抵达时间(32.65±2.57)min]、转运时间(26.75±5.46)min]及总院前救治时间(81.43±9.36)min]短于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论直升机救援能降低创伤患者病死率及严重后遗症发生率，缩短救治时间，对创伤救治有着重要意义。然而直升机救援出发时间较长，费用高，短距离救援中更适宜选择地面救援。

The study on effectiveness and feasibility of helicopter rescue in trauma treatment

ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness and feasibility of helicopter rescue in trauma treatment. MethodsA prospective control study was conducted on 132 patients who received trauma treatment in hospitals over tertiary in Huizhou from January 2016 to September 2018. The subjects included 68 males and 64 females, aged 18-60 years, with an average age of (32.94±5.31) years, they were divided into observation group and control group according to random number table method. 49 patients received helicopter rescue were taken as the observation group, and the other 83 patients received ground rescue were used as the control group. After receiving the first aid telephone, the observation group carried out the helicopter rescue, the control group carried out the ground rescue, and after the preliminary treatment at rescue place, they were sent to the hospital to the hospital for the emergency treatment according to the actual situation. The mortality rate, the incidence of serious sequela and rescue-related time were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe incidences of mortality (6.12%) and serious sequelae in the observation group (14.29%) were significantly lower than those in the control group (21.97%, 31.06%) (P<0.05). The departure time (13.26±2.83min) of the observation group was significantly longer than that of the control group (6.34±1.09min) (P<0.05). The arrival time (32.65±2.57min), the transfer time (26.75±5.46min)and the total pre-hospital treatment time (81.43±9.36min) in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionHelicopter rescue can significantly reduce the incidences of death and serious sequelae of trauma patients, shorten the duration of treatment, and has great significance for trauma treatment. However, the rescue time of helicopter rescue is longer and the cost is high, it is more suitable to choose ground rescue for short distance rescue.