Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical features and prognosis of patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of Waldeyer ring (WR‐DLBCL) and patients with lymph node DLBCL (N‐DLBCL).

METHODS:

One hundred eighty‐one patients with WR‐DLBCL and N‐DLBCL were reviewed. There were 57 patients with stage I disease, 83 patients with stage II disease, 26 patients with stage III disease, and 15 patients with stage IV disease. Among them, 101 patients had primary N‐DLBCL, and 80 patients had primary WR‐DLBCL.

RESULTS:

Patients with WR‐DLBCL and N‐DLBCL usually presented at an older age and had localized disease, a low frequency of B symptoms, a good performance status, and a low‐risk International Prognostic Index (IPI) score. Compared with patients who had N‐DLBCL, patients who had WR‐DLBCL presented with more stage II disease and lower tumor burdens. The overall response rate after treatment was similar in both groups. The 5‐year overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) rates were 76% and 61% in patients with WR‐DLBCL, respectively, and 56% and 50% in patients with N‐DLBCL, respectively (P = .119 for OS; P = .052 for PFS). IPI scores and elevated β2‐microglobulin and LDH levels were associated with a poor prognosis for patients who had WR‐DLBCL; whereas bulky tumor, elevated β2‐microglobulin levels, and IPI scores were associated with poor OS for patients who had N‐DLBCL.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current results supported the continued inclusion of WR‐DLBCL as a lymph node group in the staging of DLBCL. Patients with WR‐DLBCL had clinical features and prognosis similar to those of patients with N‐DLBCL. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.