首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

VP糊剂根管充填或空管疗法治疗乳磨牙尖周脓肿的疗效比较
引用本文:张利平. VP糊剂根管充填或空管疗法治疗乳磨牙尖周脓肿的疗效比较[J]. 广东牙病防治, 2003, 11(4): 257-258
作者姓名:张利平
作者单位:盐城市口腔医院,江苏,盐城,224001
摘    要:目的 对患尖周脓肿的乳磨牙采用VP糊剂进行根管充填或空管疗法的疗效观察。方法 将182例190颗患牙随机分为VP糊剂根管充填组和空管疗法组,1年后回访。结果 根管充填组治疗有效率为93.75%,空管疗法组为91.49%,经卡方检验两者疗效无显著性差异(x~2=0.38,P>0.05)。结论 空管疗法疗效好,操作简便,临床应用前景广阔。

关 键 词:VP糊剂  乳磨牙  根管充填  空管疗法  根尖周疾病

Comparison of Clinical Effect between Root Canal Filling and Hollow Canal Filling with Vitapex on Periapical Abscess of Primary Molar
ZHANG Liping,Stomatological Hospital Yancheng City,Yancheng. Comparison of Clinical Effect between Root Canal Filling and Hollow Canal Filling with Vitapex on Periapical Abscess of Primary Molar[J]. Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment, 2003, 11(4): 257-258
Authors:ZHANG Liping  Stomatological Hospital Yancheng City  Yancheng
Affiliation:ZHANG Liping,Stomatological Hospital Yancheng City,Yancheng 224001
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of root canal filling or hollow canal filling with Vitapex on periapical abscess ofprimary molar. Methods 190 teeth from 182 patients were randomly devided into the group of root canal filling with Vitapex andthe group of hollow canal filling with Vitapex. 1 year later after operation, the clinical effect was compared in two groups. ResultsThe success rate was 93. 75% in root canal filling group and 91. 49% in hollow canal filling group. The difference wasn't sig-nificant (P>0. 05). Conclusion Hollow canal filling with Vitapex is high effectiveness, simpfied and usefulness in clinics.
Keywords:Vitapex  primary molar  Root canal filling  Hollow canal filling
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号