Assessment of patients’ perceptions towards embryo disposition after donation of embryos to a research biobank |
| |
Authors: | Arian Khorshid Anjali Wignarajah Jiaqi Zhang Ruben Alvero Ruth B. Lathi Barry Behr Gayathree Murugappan |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University, 453 Quarry Road, Dept of OBGYN MC #5317, Stanford, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA ;2.Univfy, Los Altos, CA USA ;3.Stanford Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Center, Sunnyvale, CA USA ;4.Spring Fertility, Sunnyvale, CA USA |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() Purpose To explore perceptions towards embryo disposition among patients donating excess embryos to a research biobank.MethodsCross-sectional study of survey responses collected as part of enrollment in a research biobank. Patients are asked questions regarding the difficulty of their disposition decision, their alternative disposition choice if donation to research was not available, quality of the counseling they received, and if additional counseling throughout their treatment would have been beneficial. Survey responses use 5-point Likert scales, with “1” being lowest/least and “5” being highest/most.ResultsA total of 157 men and 163 women enrolled in the biobank. Median scores for difficulty of disposition decision were 3 for females and 2 for males, and for quality of counseling, the median scores were 4 for females and 3 for males. Seventy percent of patients would have chosen to discard their excess embryos had donation to research not been an option. Statistical analyses showed no significant difference in responses based on variations in race, religion, sexual orientation, and infertility diagnoses. Concordance of responses within heterosexual couples was tested and found to be poor to moderate.ConclusionsAssessing patients’ perceptions towards embryo disposition after donation of their excess embryos to a research biobank affords a unique perspective. The difficulty of the disposition decision, the tendency to discard embryos in the absence of a means for donation to research, and the poor agreement between heterosexual partners highlight the importance of donation to research as an accessible disposition option and the need for a personalized approach to counseling and consenting for embryo disposition.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-022-02659-x.Keyword: Embryo disposition |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|