|
|||||
|
|
| 新时代公共卫生体系的思考与研究 | |
| 引用本文： | 李程跃, 施培武, 沈群红, 张朝阳, 陈政, 蒲川, 徐凌忠, 胡志, 马安宁, 龚朝晖, 徐天强, 王磐石, 汪华, 郝超, 高翔, 李力, 周庆誉, 郝模. 论武汉新发传染病预防控制的优势与短板[J]. 上海预防医学, 2020, 32(10): 878-881. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2020.20269 |
| 作者姓名： | 李程跃 施培武 沈群红 张朝阳 陈政 蒲川 徐凌忠 胡志 马安宁 龚朝晖 徐天强 王磐石 汪华 郝超 高翔 李力 周庆誉 郝模 |
| 作者单位： | 1.复旦大学卫生发展战略研究中心，上海 200032;2.健康相关社会风险预警协同创新中心，上海 200032;3.浙江省医学科学院，浙江 杭州 310012;4.清华大学公共管理学院，北京 100084;5.国家卫生健康委员会项目资金监管服务中心，北京 100044;6.中华预防医学会公共卫生管理分会基层公共卫生管理学组，上海 201800;7.重庆医科大学公共卫生与管理学院，重庆 400016;8.山东大学公共卫生学院，山东 济南 250012;9.安徽医科大学，安徽 合肥 230032;10.济宁医学院，山东 济宁 272067;11.致公党中央医药卫生专业委员会，北京 100011;12.上海市卫生健康委员会监督所，上海 200031;13.上海市卫生健康委员会，上海 200031;14.江苏省预防医学会，江苏 南京 210009;15.常州市疾病预防控制中心，江苏 常州 213003 |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金(71774031);上海市加强公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划(2015-2017年)项目(GWIV-32) |
| 摘 要： | 在评价全国32个省会城市和计划单列市新发传染病预防控制能力的基础上，聚焦分析了武汉的优势和短板：具备依法防疫的法律基础，但未转化成有效的行动；具有应对疫情的组织基础，平战结合的协调机制未有效建立；管理机制齐备，但部门间职责分工不明确；监测网络已建立，但“预测预警”的作用并未发挥；“投入不足导致职能偏废”的现象开始回头。各地的新发传染病预防控制能力均是优势与短板并存，应当怀有警醒之心，“补短板、堵漏洞、强弱项”，亡羊补牢，为时未晚。 |
| 关 键 词： | 新发传染病预防控制 能力评价 优势 短板 武汉 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-04-18 |
Qualitative research:institutional preparedness during threats of infectious disease outbreaks |
|
| LI Cheng-yue, SHI Pei-wu, SHEN Qun-hong, ZHANG Zhao-yang, CHEN Zheng, PU Chuan, XU Ling-zhong, HU Zhi, MA An-ning, GONG Zhao-hui, XU Tian-qiang, WANG Pan-shi, WANG Hua, HAO Chao, GAO Xiang, LI Li, ZHOU Qing-yu, HAO Mo. Discussion on advantages and disadvantages in prevention and control of emerging infectious disease in Wuhan[J]. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2020, 32(10): 878-881. DOI: 10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2020.20269 | |
| Authors: | LI Cheng-yue SHI Pei-wu SHEN Qun-hong ZHANG Zhao-yang CHEN Zheng PU Chuan XU Ling-zhong HU Zhi MA An-ning GONG Zhao-hui XU Tian-qiang WANG Pan-shi WANG Hua HAO Chao GAO Xiang LI Li ZHOU Qing-yu HAO Mo |
| Affiliation: | 1.Research Institute of Health Development Strategies, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China;2.Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China;3.Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, China;4.School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;5.Project Supervision Center of National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100044, China;6.Department of Grassroots Public Health Management Group, Public Health Management Branch of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, Shanghai 201800, China;7.School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China;8.School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China;9.Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China;10.Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272067, China;11.Committee on Medicine and Health of Central Committee of China ZHI GONG PARTY, Beijing 100011, China;12.Institute of Inspection and Supervision, Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, Shanghai 200031, China;13.Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, Shanghai 200031, China;14.Jiangsu Preventive Medicine Association, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China;15.Changzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, China |
| Abstract: | On the basis of systematic evaluation of 32 provincial capital cities and municipalities in their capacity for preventing and controlling emerging infectious diseases, focus analysis is made on Wuhan in relation to its advantages and disadvantages as follows:There has been a legal basis for epidemic prevention according to law, but it has not translated into effective action.There has been an organizational basis for responding to epidemic, but coordination mechanism has not been effectively established.The management mechanism has been complete, but the division of responsibilities among different departments has not been clear.The monitoring network has been set up, but its role of |
| Keywords: | the new infectious diseases control and prevention capacity evaluation advantages shortcomings Wuhan |
| 点击此处可从《上海预防医学》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《上海预防医学》下载全文 | |