三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统开腹胆囊切除术的临床疗效比较

目的：观察三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术疗效及安全性,并与传统开腹胆囊切除术的临床疗效作比较,旨在为临床治疗胆囊疾病提供进一步的指导依据。方法：选择我院外科2008年1月～2010年1月住院的接受胆囊切除术的76例患者,根据手术方法的不同随机分为A组（三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术）和B组（传统开腹胆囊切除术）各38例,观察比较两组平均切口长度、平均手术时间、术中平均出血量、平均住院时间及术后并发症（切口感染、切口出血、胆漏、放射痛、胆管损伤）情况。结果：76例患者中行三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术组38例术后2～6d出院,无死亡病例。其中A组平均切口长度、平均手术时间、术中平均出血量、平均住院时间均明显短于B组（P〈0.05）;A组发生并发症如切口感染、切口出血、胆漏、放射痛的发生率明显低于B组,两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊外科疾病手术用时少,术中出血量少,发生切口出血、感染、胆漏等并发症少于传统手术组,且对患者创伤小,患者痛苦少,适合基层医院广泛推广和应用。

Comparison of the clinical efficacy between laparoscopic cholecystectomy with three holes and traditional open cholecystectomy

Objective:To observe and compare the efficacy and safety of surgery between laparoscopic cholecystectomy with three holes and conventional open cholecystectomy,and for providing further guidance basis.Methods:76 cases with cholecystectomy patients from January 2008 to January 2010 in our hospital were divided into A group(laparoscopic cholecystectomy with three holes) and B group(traditional open cholecystectomy),each 38 cases,according to the different surgical methods,and ovserved and compared the average...