首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

Cobe Spectra与Fenwal CS 3000 Plus血细胞分离器外周血造血干/祖细胞的采集效能比较
引用本文:杨申淼,刘开彦,陆道培. Cobe Spectra与Fenwal CS 3000 Plus血细胞分离器外周血造血干/祖细胞的采集效能比较[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志, 2005, 13(2): 245-249
作者姓名:杨申淼  刘开彦  陆道培
作者单位:北京大学人民医院,北京大学血液病研究所,北京,100044
基金项目:北京市科委基金(编号9550213100)国家重点基础研究基金(编号2001CB510105)
摘    要:
为了评价Cobe Spectra(Version6.1)和Fenwal CS 3000 Plus两种血细胞分离机在造血干/祖细胞采集中的采集效能,对36人64次外周血造血干/祖细胞的采集进行了回顾性分析.20人42次使用Cobe Spectra采集,16人22次使用Fenwal CS 3000 Plus采集对CD34^ 细胞采集量、采集效率以及红细胞与血小板的采集量进行比较,结果表明:Cobe Spectra和Fenwal CS 3000 Plus在CD34^ 细胞采集量和采集效率上无显著差异?CD34^ 细胞采集量与供者白细胞、单核细胞、造血祖细胞、CD34^ 细胞的动员情况呈正相关,在多因素stepwise线性回归模型中,采集前外周血干/祖细胞浓度是唯一有意义的影响因素,Fenwal CS 3000 Plus的采集效率与外周血单核细胞量呈负相关。Fenwal CS 3000 Plus对红细胞的收集量显著高于Cobe Spectra,并且采集后供者外周血血小板降低程度较Cobe Spectra更严重。结论:Cobe Spectra(Version 6.1)和Fenwal CS 3000 Plus在CD34^ 细胞的采集能力上无显著差别。当外周血单核细胞数量高,或是血型不合移植的及血小板减少的供者,推荐使用Cobe Spectra血细胞分离机.

关 键 词:血细胞分离机 外周血造血干细胞 Cobe Spectra Fenwal CS 3000 Plus CD34^+细胞 采集效率
文章编号:1009-2137(2005)02-0245-05
修稿时间:2004-04-21

Comparison of the Effect of Cobe Spectra and Fenwal CS 3000 Plus Blood Cell Separators in Collection of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Components
YANG Shen-Miao,LIU Kai-Yan,LU Dao-Pei. Comparison of the Effect of Cobe Spectra and Fenwal CS 3000 Plus Blood Cell Separators in Collection of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Components[J]. Journal of experimental hematology, 2005, 13(2): 245-249
Authors:YANG Shen-Miao  LIU Kai-Yan  LU Dao-Pei
Affiliation:Institute of Hematology, People Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100044, China.
Abstract:
To evaluate the hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell apheresis effect of Cobe Spectra (Version 6. 1) and Fenwal CS 3000 Plus cell separators, fourty-two procedures on twenty donors using Cobe Spectra cell separator and twenty-two procedures on sixteen donors using Fenwal CS 3000 Plus cell separator were retrospectively analyzed. The number of CD34 cells collected, the collection efficiency (CE) of CD34 cells and the contaminations of red blood cell and platelet in the stem/progenitor cell products of two devices were compared. The results showed that there were no significant differences in the total number of CD34 cells collected and the CD34 cell CE between the two devices. There were positive correlations between the count of peripheral blood cells including leukocyte, monocyte, hematopoietic progenitor cell and CD34 cell after mobilization and the total number of CD34 cells collected. The stepwise multiple variable analyses revealed the peripheral blood stem/ progenitor cell count emerged as the only significant independent predictive factor for CE. A negative correlation was seen between the peripheral blood monocyte count and the CD34 cell CE for the Fenwal CS 3000 Plus. The Fenwal CS 3000 Plus product contained more red blood cells than that of the Cobe Spectra. The decrease in the peripheral platelet count after Fenwal CS 3000 Plus apheresis was also greater. It is concluded that collection efficacy of Cobe Spectra (Version 6.1) and Fenwal CS 3000 Plus was similar. Cobe Spectra shall be used preferably to assure higher CD34 cell CE at a high peripheral blood monocyte count. The Cobe Spectra cell separator is better for the donors with mismatched blood type and the donors with thrombocytopenia.
Keywords:blood cell separator  Cobe Spectra  Fenwal CS 3000 Plus  peripheral blood stem cell  CD34 cell  collection efficiency  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号