Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Contemporary rotating hinge knee (RHK) prosthesis has shown improved survival rates over earlier generations. However, reports of high complication and mechanical failure rates highlight the need for more clinical outcome data in the complex primary and revision setting. The purpose of this study is to report our results of using a contemporary rotating hinge for complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

Using a prospectively maintained surgical database, 79 knees in 76 patients who underwent an RHK of a single design for either a complex primary (14 knees) or revision total knee arthroplasty (65 knees) were identified. This included 19% undergoing an RHK for periprosthetic joint infection and 32.9% who had concomitant extensor mechanism repair. The cohort consisted of 60 women and 16 men with a mean age of 66.7 years (range 39-89) at the time of surgery. Patient outcomes were assessed using Knee Society Scores and radiographs were reviewed for signs of wear and loosening. Failure rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

Results

At a minimum of 2 years, 13 patients had died and 4 were lost to follow-up, leaving 62 knees in 59 patients who were followed for a mean of 55.2 months (range 24-146). The mean Knee Society Scores improved from 35.7 to 66.2 points (P < .01). The incidence of complications was 38.7%. The most common complications were periprosthetic fracture, extensor mechanism rupture, and periprosthetic infection. Estimated survival was 70.7% at 5 years.

Conclusion

Despite improvements in design and biomaterials, there remains a relatively high complication rate associated with the use of a modern RHK implant. While aseptic loosening was rare, periprosthetic fracture, infection, and extensor mechanism failure were substantial emphasizing the complex nature of these cases.