Abstract: | Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR) offers considerable promise in treating high risk patients with aortic valve disease. Two devices are currently clinically available for transfemoral delivery: the Edwards‐Sapien balloon‐expandable bioprosthesis and the Corevalve self‐expanding bioprosthesis, both of which require careful sizing of the peripheral vasculature. Through a case based discussion, we illustrate that these limits of PAVR technology can be stretched in cases of extraordinary clinical need. We demonstrate that, following a learning curve of “optimal cases,” successful PAVR is also possible in diffusely diseased peripheries of borderline small size or with focal aortoiliofemoral disease amenable to a separate intervention beforehand. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |