老年患者两种浅静脉穿刺方法比较

目的探讨老年患者最佳静脉穿刺方法。方法随机选择400例60岁以上心血管疾病患者,分别采取正面和侧面穿刺方法,分析不同穿刺方法对穿刺成功率、耗时数、疼痛度的影响。结果正面穿刺比侧面穿刺成功率高(P<0.05);正面穿刺较侧面穿刺疼痛度低(P<0.05);正面穿刺耗时数与侧面穿刺相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论老年患者血管硬化、弹性下降,适合采用浅静脉正面穿刺。

Study on the two methods of venipuncture in elderly patients

Objective To explore the best method of venipuncture in elderly patients.Method 400 elderly patients with cardiovascular diseases aged over 60 years were sampled randomly.The method of head-on venipuncture and lateral venipuncture were used respectively.Then,the success rate,time-consuming and patients' pain were compared.Results Compared with lateral venipuncture,the success rate was higher in the group of head-on venipuncture(P<0.05),and patients' pain were lower(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in time-consuming(P>0.05).Conclusion Because the elderly patients' vein characterized by sclerosis,poor elasticity and brittleness,it is suitable to use the method of head-on venipuncture.