The role of co-factors in the progression from human papillomavirus infection to cervical cancer |
| |
Authors: | Patricia Luhn Joan Walker Mark Schiffman Rosemary E. Zuna S. Terence Dunn Michael A. Gold Katherine Smith Cara Mathews Richard A. Allen Roy Zhang Sophia Wang Nicolas Wentzensen |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA;2. Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Center for Cancer Training, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA;3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA;4. Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA;5. Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA;6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tulsa Cancer Institute, University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, OK, USA;7. Division of Cancer Etiology, City of Hope and the Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectiveCo-factors for cervical cancer, including oral contraceptive (OC) use, smoking and multiparity have been identified; however, the stage at which they act in cervical carcinogenesis is not clear. We compared established risk factors among women with CIN2 and CIN3 to evaluate the heterogeneity of these factors in precancer and also assessed their role during cervical carcinogenesis.MethodsThe current analysis included 2783 women with various stages of cervical disease who were enrolled in the Study to Understand Cervical Cancer Early Endpoints and Determinants (SUCCEED) and the Biopsy Study. Associations of co-factors within cervical precancer and at different stages of cervical carcinogenesis were estimated using logistic regression.ResultsLong-term OC use (10 + years vs. never: OR = 2.42, 95% CI: [1.13–5.15]), multiparity (3 + births vs. nulliparous: OR = 1.54 [1.04–2.28]), smoking (ever vs. never: OR = 1.95 [1.48–2.58]), and no Pap test in the previous five years (2.05 [1.32–3.17]) were positively associated with CIN3 compared to CIN2. We observed that long-term OC use, parity and smoking were associated with an increased risk of CIN3 compared to < CIN2 (1.97 [1.12–3.46]; 2.23 [1.59–3.11]; 2.60 [2.04–3.30], respectively), whereas associations were not significantly different (OC use, parity) or showed decreased risk (smoking) when comparing cancer to CIN3.ConclusionsDifferences in established risk factors suggest that CIN3 is a more specific definition of precancer than CIN2. Hormonally-related factors and smoking play a role in the transition from human papillomavirus infection to precancer. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|