The comparative effects on plaque regrowth of phenolic chlorhexidine and anti-adhesive mouthrinses |
| |
Authors: | J. Moran M. Addy R. Newcombe P. Warren |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Dental School, Bristol, England and;Department of Medical Computing and Statistics, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales;Pharmaceuticals Division, Imperial Chemical Industries, Macclesfield, England |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract The inhibition of bacterial attachment to the tooth surface is one possible approach to plaque control. This study evaluated in vivo the plaque inhibitory action of a novel copolymer reported to have considerable antiadhesive properties in vitro. The study was a single blind. 5-treatment. randomised Latin square crossover design, incorporating balance for carry-over effects. The rinses were the antiadhesive (1%), the antiadhesive with 0.02% chlorhexidine, a 0.2% chlorhexidine rinse product, an essential oil/phenolic rinse product and water. 15 volunteers participated and on day 1 of each study period were rendered plaque-free, ceased toothcleaning and rinsed 2x daily. under supervision, with the allocated formulation. On day 5, plaque was scored by index and area. Washout periods were 21/2 days. Alone or combined with chlorhexidine, the antiadhesive agent showed no effects greater than water. The chlorhexidine rinse was significantly more effective than the essential oil/phenolic rinse which in turn was significantly more effective than the other rinses. |
| |
Keywords: | chlorhexidine dental plaque clinical trial phenols antiadhesive compounds mouthrinses |
|
|