心理弹性量表(CD-RISC)在大学生中的信效度验证及结构探讨

目的:考察Connor-Davidson心理弹性量表(CD-RISC)的信度与效度,通过比较3种结构模型的拟合指标以判断哪种模型更适用于国内大学生人群。方法:使用心理弹性量表(CD-RISC)、艾森克人格问卷简式量表成人版(EPQ-RSC)对400在校大学生进行问卷调查。结果:对心理弹性量表的探索性因素分析获得4因素模型,即抗压力、自我控制、目标定向、社会适应性。验证性因素分析拟合指数(χ~2/df=1.85,RMSEA=0.046,GFI=0.94,AGFI=0.92,CFI=0.94,NNFI=0.93)、内部一致性信度为0.87,效标效度均表明4因素模型较好。结论:大学生中的心理弹性结构遵循4因素模型,在以后的研究工作中需进一步验证。

Reliability and Validity of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC) in Chinese College Students

Objective:To examine the reliability and validity of the Connor -Davidson resilience scale(CD -RISC) in college students by comparing the fitting indicators of the three different structure models to determine which model is more suitable for the domestic college students .Methods:Application of psychological resilience scale(CD-RISC) ,Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Short Scale(EPQ -RSC)of more than 400 college students by question‐naire survey .Results:Factor analysis of the data in this survey showed it included 4-factor structure of resilience(la‐beled respectively as tenacity ,self -control ,goal orientation ,social adaptability) .The results of confirmatory factor analysis were χ2/df=1 8.5 ,RMSEA=0 0.46 ,GFI=0 9.4 ,AGFI=0 9.2 ,CFI=0 9.4 ,NNFI=0 9.3 ,its Cronbach's αwas 0 8.7 and criterion validity indicated the 4-factor structure model which provided a reasonable good fit for Chinese college students .Conclusion:In the Chinese college students ,resilience scale follows the 4 -factor model .However , the understanding of the construct may also need some modification in the later research work .