强化敏感性量表的编制

目的:编制适合我国文化背景的强化敏感性量表。方法:在文献综述、开放式调查的基础上编制出量表条目,并以724名在校大学生为被试样本对该量表进行项目分析和信效度检验。结果:1项目分析表明,除条目5和条目20外,其他的测试条目均具有良好的区分度;2验证性因素分析表明,由奖励敏感性和惩罚敏感性两个独立的子量表构成的测量模型拟合良好;3奖励敏感性子量表得分与BAS量表呈显著正相关(r=0.36,P0.01),惩罚敏感性子量表得分与BIS量表呈显著正相关(r=0.58,P0.01);4奖励敏感性和惩罚敏感性分量表的α系数分别为0.76和0.72,与3周后重测得分的相关分别为0.73和0.71(P0.01)。结论:初步编制的强化敏感性量表具有良好的信效度,基本符合心理测量学要求。

Development of Reinforcement Sensitivity Scale

Objective :To develop the Reinforcement Sensitivity Scale and test its reliability and validity .Methods :The initial items were generated from literature review and open questionnaire survey .Then ,we recruited 724 collage students as samples to conduct item analysis ,reliability test and validity test .Results :① Item analysis indicated that except for item 5 and item 20 ,all of the initial items possessed acceptable item discrimination index ;② Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 2 factors measurement model which contained reward sensitivity and punishment sensitivity as two independent dimensions had acceptable model fit index ;③ The correlation between the reward sen‐sitivity sub - scale and the BAS scale was 0 .36(P < 0 .01) ,the correlation between the punishment sensitivity sub -scale and the BIS scale was 0 .58 (P < 0 .01) ;④ The internal consistency of the reward sensitivity sub - scale was 0 .76 ,the internal consistency of the punishment sensitivity sub - scale was 0 .72 ,the test - retest reliability (3 weeks interval)of the reward sensitivity sub - scale was 0 .73(P < 0 .01) ,the test - retest reliability(3 weeks interval)of the punishment sensitivity sub - scale was 0 .71(P < 0 .01) .Conclusion :The reliability and validity of the Reinforcement Sensitivity Scale meet the needs of psycho - metrics .