股浅动脉首期置入自膨式支架与球囊扩张成形的疗效比较

Objective To compare the mid-term clinical results of primary implantation of a selfexpanding nitinol stent and primary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for long range arteriosclerosis obliterans of the superficial femoral artery. Methods From December 2005 to February 2007,109 patients who had moderate-severe claudication or chronic limb ischemia (CLI)due to stenosis or occlusion of the superficial femoral artery were treated by endovascular technology. 53 patients (73 limbs) were treated by primary stenting and 56 patients (76 limbs)by PTA. We compared the clinical data of stenting group and PTA group at 6,12 and 24 months. Results The mean length of the treated segment was (16± 8)cm in the stenting group and(15±7)cm in the PTA group. At 6 months, the rate of restenosis on duplex ultrasonography was 13.7% in stenting group and 30.2% in PTA group (X2=4.09, P<0.05);at 12 months the restenosis rates were 25.5% in stenting group and 46.9% in PTA group(X2=4.75, P<0.05);at 24 months the restenosis rates on duplex ultrasonography were 38.1% in stenting group and 65.9% in PTA group(X2=6.66, P<0.01). Rutherford stages in stenting group were significantly better than those in PTA group. Conclusion In the mid-term, primary implantation of a self-expanding nitinol stent yielded results that were superior to those with PTA for arteriosclerosis obliterans or long range stenosis of the superficial femoral artery.

Primary implantation of a self-expanding nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for arteriosclerosis obliterans of superficial femoral artery