经皮冠状动脉介入治疗老年冠心病临床疗效观察

目的：对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗老年冠心病的临床疗效进行观察与体会分析。方法：选取经皮冠状动脉介入术治疗的78例老年冠心病患者作为观察组，再选取予以药物保守治疗的75例老年冠心痛患者进行对比研究（即对照组），同时对两组患者QTd、HRV以及冠心病者生活质量测评专用量表（SAQ）进行观察和评定、记录，且对其结果进行统计学处理分析。结果：不同时间段QTd、HRV相应指标变化结果显示观察组患者在治疗后10d、治疗后30d分别与治疗前相比P〈0．01、P〈0．05，对照组治疗后30d与治疗前相比P〈0．05，而两组患者相应时间段各指标相比P〈0．05；观察组患者生活质量在治疗后30d优于治疗后10d，治疗后10d优于治疗前；同时观察组患者生活质量优于对照组。结论：经皮冠状动脉介入治疗老年冠心痛效果显著且有效，值得临床推广。

Clinical Observation on the Treatment of CHD in Elderly Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Objective： To observe the clinical efficacy of the treatment of coronary heart disease （ CHD ） in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Method： 78 elderly patients with CHD after percutaneous coronary intervention treatment was selected as the observation group, another conservative medical treatment of 75 elderly patients with CHD who were selected comparative study （ the control group }, while the QTd, HRV and coronary heart disease-specific quality of life assessment scale { SAQ } were ob- served and assessed, and the results were statistically analysed. Results： QTd, HRV corresponding indica- tors of changes in the results of different periods： the observation group patients 10 days after treatment, 30 days after treatment, respectively, compared with that before treatment P〈0.01, P〈0.05, control group af- ter treatment30 days compared with before treatment P〈0.05, for the corresponding period of the two groups of patients indicators compared P〈0.05 ; quality of life of patients in the observation group 30 days after the treatment is better than treatment after 10 days, and 10 days after treatment, excellentbefore treatment; quality of life of the observation group were better than the control group. Conclusion：The treatment of coronary heart disease in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention effect is significant and effective, It is worthy of promotion.