Relation between wall thickening on gated perfusion SPECT and functional recovery after coronary revascularization in patients with previous myocardial infarction |
| |
Authors: | Mario?Petretta,Giovanni?Storto,Wanda?Acampa,Valeria?Sansone,Laura?Evangelista,Letizia?Spinelli,Alberto?Cuocolo mailto:cuocolo@unina.it" title=" cuocolo@unina.it" itemprop=" email" data-track=" click" data-track-action=" Email author" data-track-label=" " >Email author |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Institute of Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Heart Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy;(2) Department of Biomorphological and Functional Sciences, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging of the National Council of Research, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy;(3) IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy |
| |
Abstract: | Purpose This study aimed to evaluate whether wall thickening analysis by gated perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is useful in predicting functional recovery after revascularization.Methods Forty-one patients with previous myocardial infarction and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (ejection fraction, EF, 36±6%) who were scheduled for revascularization underwent rest 99mTc-sestamibi gated SPECT.Results Of 131 akinetic or dyskinetic segments at baseline echocardiography, 82 (63%) recovered after revascularization. Compared with wall thickening analysis, perfusion imaging provided higher sensitivity (78% vs 50%, P<0.0001) and specificity (80% vs 71%, P<0.0005). Among segments with 55% sestamibi uptake (viable), those with detectable wall thickening had a higher likelihood of functional recovery than those with absent wall thickening (95% vs 77%, P<0.05). In segments with improved function, the absence of wall thickening was associated with lower sestamibi activity than was observed when detectable wall thickening was present (58±14% vs 71±13%, P<0.0005). An increase in EF of 5% was detectable in 22 (54%) patients. For the prediction of EF improvement, perfusion imaging provided a higher sensitivity than wall thickening analysis (68% vs 41%, P<0.05), while specificity was not significantly different (68% vs 74%). The prevalence of patients with functional recovery did not change when wall thickening analysis was considered in addition to perfusion status (73% in patients with detectable wall thickening and 70% in those without; P=NS).Conclusion In patients with coronary artery disease, wall thickening analysis by gated perfusion SPECT provides additional information compared with perfusion data for the prediction of segmental functional recovery. However, on a patient basis, wall thickening assessment seems to be of more limited value than perfusion status. |
| |
Keywords: | Wall thickening Gated SPECT Functional recovery Left ventricular dysfunction |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|