Brain structural deficits and working memory fMRI dysfunction in young adults who were diagnosed with ADHD in adolescence |
| |
Authors: | Andres Roman-Urrestarazu Päivi Lindholm Irma Moilanen Vesa Kiviniemi Jouko Miettunen Erika Jääskeläinen Pirjo Mäki Tuula Hurtig Hanna Ebeling Jennifer H. Barnett Juha Nikkinen John Suckling Peter B. Jones Juha Veijola Graham K. Murray |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Psychiatry,University of Cambridge,Cambridge,UK;2.Department of Child Psychiatry, Institute of Clinical Medicine,University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital,Oulu,Finland;3.Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Institute of Diagnostics,Oulu University Hospital,Oulu,Finland;4.Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Clinical Medicine,University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital,Oulu,Finland;5.Department of Public Health Sciences and General Practice, Institute of Health Sciences,University of Oulu,Oulu,Finland;6.Medical Research Center Oulu,University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital,Oulu,Finland;7.Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy,Oulu University Hospital,Oulu,Finland;8.NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre,Cambridge,UK;9.Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute,University of Cambridge,Cambridge,UK |
| |
Abstract: | When adolescents with ADHD enter adulthood, some no longer meet disorder diagnostic criteria but it is unknown if biological and cognitive abnormalities persist. We tested the hypothesis that people diagnosed with ADHD during adolescence present residual brain abnormalities both in brain structure and in working memory brain function. 83 young adults (aged 20–24 years) from the Northern Finland 1986 Birth Cohort were classified as diagnosed with ADHD in adolescence (adolescence ADHD, n = 49) or a control group (n = 34). Only one patient had received medication for ADHD. T1-weighted brain scans were acquired and processed in a voxel-based analysis using permutation-based statistics. A sub-sample of both groups (ADHD, n = 21; controls n = 23) also performed a Sternberg working memory task whilst acquiring fMRI data. Areas of structural difference were used as a region of interest to evaluate the implications that structural abnormalities found in the ADHD group might have on working memory function. There was lower grey matter volume bilaterally in adolescence ADHD participants in the caudate (p < 0.05 FWE corrected across the whole brain) at age 20–24. Working memory was poorer in adolescence ADHD participants, with associated failure to show normal load-dependent caudate activation. Young adults diagnosed with ADHD in adolescence have structural and functional deficits in the caudate associated with abnormal working memory function. These findings are not secondary to stimulant treatment, and emphasise the importance of taking a wider perspective on ADHD outcomes than simply whether or not a particular patient meets diagnostic criteria at any given point in time. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|