首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

透视下痛点阻滞与针刀治疗梨状肌综合征的临床观察
引用本文:范茂龙. 透视下痛点阻滞与针刀治疗梨状肌综合征的临床观察[J]. 实用疼痛学杂志, 2008, 4(4): 277-279
作者姓名:范茂龙
作者单位:江苏省昆山市巴城人民医院介入疼痛科,215311
摘    要:
目的观察痛点阻滞与小针刀治疗梨状肌综合征的临床观察。方法将118例梨状肌综合征的患者,随机分为两组,A组为治疗组72例,在透视下采用小针刀加痛点阻滞法;B组为对照组46例,采用镇痛液局部痛点阻滞。结果A组和B组有效者分别为70例(97.2%)与34例(73.9%),A组有效率明显高于B组(P〈0.05);复发者A组1例(1.3%),B组12例(26.0%),A组明显低于B组(P〈0.05)。结论在梨状肌综合征的非手术治疗方法中,透视下痛点阻滞加小针刀治疗,疗效好,并且优于单纯痛点阻滞法。

关 键 词:梨状肌损伤综合征  触痛点,肌筋膜  神经传导阻滞  小刀针

Effect of trigger point block and knife-needle combined therapy to treat pirtform syndrome under the guidance of X-ray
FAN Mao-long. Effect of trigger point block and knife-needle combined therapy to treat pirtform syndrome under the guidance of X-ray[J]. Pain Clinic Journal, 2008, 4(4): 277-279
Authors:FAN Mao-long
Affiliation:FAN Mao-long.( Pain Clinic of People's Hospital of Bacheng , Kunshan 215311 , China)
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of knife-needle and trigger point block on piriform syndrome. Methods 118 patients with piriform syndrome were divided into two groups. Trigger point block and knife-needle combined therapy were received in group A (72 cases); Trigger point block therapy only was in group B (46 cases) . Results The effective and recurrent rates were 97% (70 cases) and 1.3% (1 case) in group A, and 74% (34 cases) and 26. 0% (12 cases) in group B respectively. The clinical efficacy was significant better in group A than that in group B (P〈0. 05). Conclusion Among the non-opreative therapies for piriform syndrome, trigger point block and knife-needle combined therapy under the guidance of X-ray is superior than trigger point block therapy only.
Keywords:Piriformis Injury Syndrome  Trigger Points, Myofascial  Nerve Bloek  Small Knife Needle
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号