首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Differences in hospital outcomes following traumatic injury for patients experiencing immediate transfer to a level I trauma facility versus resuscitation at a critical access hospital (CAH)
Authors:Jered Windorski  Jared Reyes  Stephen D. Helmer  Jeanette G. Ward  James M. Haan
Affiliation:1. Department of Surgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine – Wichita, Wichita, KS, USA;2. Department of Medical Education, Via Christi Hospital Saint Francis, Wichita, KS, USA;3. Department of Trauma Services, Chandler Regional Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA;4. Trauma Services, Via Christi Hospital Saint Francis, Wichita, KS, USA
Abstract:

Background

Critical access hospitals (CAH) serve a key role in providing medical care to rural patients. The purpose of this study was to assess effectiveness of CAHs in initial care of trauma patients.

Methods

A 5-year retrospective review was conducted of all adult trauma patients who were transported directly to a level I trauma facility or were transported to a CAH then transferred to a level I trauma facility after initial resuscitation.

Results

Of 1478 patients studied, 1084 were transferred from a CAH with 394 transported directly to the level I facility. Patients transported directly to the level I hospital were younger and more severely injured. After controlling for injury severity score, age, GCS, and shock, the odds of mortality did not differ between CAH transfer patients and patients transported directly to a level I facility (OR 0.70, P?=?0.20). Transfer from CAH was associated with decreased ICU and hospital days, but not associated with increased ventilator days.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that use of a CAH for initial trauma care in rural areas is effective.
Keywords:Trauma  Critical access hospital  Transfer  Outcomes  Rural hospital
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号