|
|||||
|
|
| 小儿哮喘通过不同雾化吸入治疗的恢复效果差异 | |
| 引用本文： | 杨静容,吴让琼. 小儿哮喘通过不同雾化吸入治疗的恢复效果差异[J]. 今日健康(家庭版), 2016, 0(1) |
| 作者姓名： | 杨静容 吴让琼 |
| 作者单位： | 成都市新都区人民医院，四川 成都，610500 |
| 摘 要： | 目的：探讨小儿哮喘通过不同雾化吸入治疗的恢复效果。方法：研究对象为我院2014年9月至2015年9月期间收治的80例小儿哮喘患者，分为对照组和观察组各40例，其中对照组运用空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗，观察组运用氧驱动雾化吸入治疗，分析不同治疗方式的效果差异。结果：在呼吸困难、喘息、胸闷咳嗽等症状消除时间与住院时长上，观察组均短于对照组，p<0.05；在治疗有效率上，观察组为97.5%，对照组为80%，p<0.05。结论：小儿哮喘通过氧驱动雾化吸入治疗可以提升治疗疗效，加快疾病恢复速度。 |
| 关 键 词： | 小儿哮喘 氧驱动雾化吸入 空气压缩泵雾化吸入 治疗效果 |
Pediatric asthma inhaler recovery effect difference of treatment by different atomization |
|
| Abstract: | Objective:To investigate the treatment of children with asthma inhaler recovery results by different atomization. Methods:80 cases of pediatric asthma patients were divided into a control group and observation group with 40 patients in the control group using compressed air pump inhalation, the observation group drive using oxygen inhalation. Results:The symptom elimination time, a long time in hospital, the treatment efficiency, the observation group than the control group. Conclusion:You can enhance the therapeutic effect, accelerate the speed of recovery in children with asthma disease by inhalation of oxygen atomizing. |
| Keywords: | children with asthma oxygen inhalation drive air compressor pump inhalation treatment effect |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |