Peabody运动发育量表及配套运动训练方案在运动发育落后患儿中的应用

目的探讨Peabody运动发育量表（PDMS-2）评估方法对发育落后患儿各运动能区发育水平的判断，评价其配套训练方案在改善这些患儿运动技能中的应用价值。方法选取0～5岁运动发育落后患儿56例进行运动发育水平评估（用PDMS-2量表），结果显示单纯粗大运动发育落后患儿12例，单纯精细运动发育落后患儿5例，整体运动功能发育落后患儿39例，随机将这56例患几分为干预组（26例）与对照组（30例），根据PDMS-2评估结果运用其配套训练方案对干预组进行干预，对照组不给任何干预，6个月后再次对两组患儿各运动能区发育水平进行评估（用PDMS-2）。结果干预前对照组粗大运动商（GMQ）、精细运动商（FMQ）和总运动商（TMQ）与干预组之间差异无显著性（P〉0．05）；干预后评估显示两组患儿运动技能都有所提高，但干预组GMQ、FMQ和TMQ均显著大于对照组（P〈0．05）。结论PDMS-2评估方法对发育落后患儿各运动能区发育水平有很好的评估作用，其配套训练方案对提高这些患儿的运动技能是很有价值的。

Application of Peabody developmental motor scales 2(PDMS-2)and the Motor activities program in children with delayed motor

Objective： To study the effects of Peabody developmental motor scales 2 （PDMS -2） evaluation methods in children with delayed motor and the Motor activities program that improve these children＇s motor functions. Methods： 56 cases of children with delayed motor, 0 -5 years old was evaluated using PDMS -2. The results showed that 12 cases with gross motor retardation, 5cases with fine motor retardation, 39 cases with overall motor retardation. These 56 cases were randomly divided into intervention group （26 cases） and the control group （30 cases） . Intervention with the Motor activities program was only applied in the intervention group according to the results of PDMS - 2 assessment, 6 months later, all cases was evaluated again using PDMS -2. Results： Intervention before there was no significantly diference of GMQ, FMQ, TMQ in the two groups （ P 〉0. 05）. All children have their motor functions improved 6 months later, but the intervention group GMQ, FMQ and TMQ were significantly greater than the control group （ P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion ： PDMS - 2 was suitable to evaluate motor function changes in children with delayed motor and the Motor activities program improve these children＇ s motor functions is of great value.