25-gauge, sutureless vitrectomy and standard 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative pilot study

Background The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and functional outcome of a small incision, sutureless vitrectomy in the treatment of idiopathic epiretinal membranes (ERM) compared with a standard 20-gauge vitrectomy system.Methods Forty-six consecutive patients with idiopathic ERM were recruited for this study and prospectively evaluated. In group 1 (n=26) we used a transconjunctival sutureless 25-gauge vitrectomy system (TSV), patients in group 2 (n=20) were operated on using a standard 20-gauge vitrectomy system. The ERM was removed and the internal limiting membrane (ILM) was peeled in all eyes. Surgery-related complications, operating time, intraoperative balanced salt solution (BSS) consumption, postoperative discomfort, postoperative intraocular inflammation, lens opacification, and long-term visual outcome are reported and compared.Results No surgery-related complications were observed in either group. Operating time was shorter in group 1 compared with group 2 (mean 15.6 and 29.6 min respectively). Intraoperative amount of BSS consumption was less in group 1 (mean 28 ml in group 1 and 42 ml in group 2). Postoperative discomfort and intraocular inflammation were significantly reduced in the 25-gauge group. In the 20-gauge group cataract formation requiring surgery was observed in two eyes. Visual acuity improved significantly in both groups. The 25-gauge group improved on average by more lines of vision and the improvement in vision was more rapid.Conclusion The TSV system is a safe and efficient surgical technique for ERM surgery. Operating time is significantly reduced, minimizing surgery-induced trauma, and reducing postoperative intraocular inflammation and the patients’ discomfort. The incidence of cataract formation may be less using TSV. Postoperative recovery is accelerated.The authors have no financial interests related to this publication.