首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


The Clinical Potential of Frailty Indicators on Identifying Recurrent Fallers in the Community: The Mr. Os and Ms. OS Cohort Study in Hong Kong
Institution:1. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong;2. Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong;1. Division of Family Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY;2. Signature HealthCARE, Louisville, KY;3. Medical Services and Quality System, The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society, Sioux Falls, SD;4. Genesis HealthCare, Lake Forest, CA;1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium;2. Department of Geriatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium;1. Department of Orthopedics, Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang, Henan Province, China;2. Department of Anorectal Surgery, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China;3. Anorectal Disease Institute of Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai, China
Abstract:ObjectivesTo compare the clinical value of 3 frailty indicators in a screening pathway for identifying older men and women who are at risk of falls.DesignA prospective cohort study.Setting and participantsFour thousand Chinese adults (2000 men) aged ≥65 years were recruited from the community in Hong Kong.MethodsThe Cardiovascular Health Study Criteria, the FRAIL scale, and the Study for Osteoporosis and Fracture Criteria (SOF) were included for evaluation. Fall history was used as a comparative predictor. Recurrent falls during the second year after baseline was the primary outcome. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the ability of the frailty indicators and fall history to predict recurrent falls. Independent predictors identified in logistic regression were put in the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis to evaluate their performance in screening high-risk fallers.ResultsFall history predicts recurrent falls in both men and women (AUC: men = 0.681; women = 0.645) better than all frailty indicators (AUC ≤ 0.641). After adjusting for fall history, only FRAIL (AUC = 0.676) and SOF (AUC = 0.673) remained as significant predictors for women whereas no frailty indicator remained significant in men.FRAIL could classify older women into 2 groups with distinct chances of being a recurrent faller in people with no fall history (3.8% vs 7.5%), a single fall history (9.5% vs 37.5%), and history of recurrent falls (16.0% vs 30.8%). SOF has limited ability in identifying recurrent fallers in the group of older adults with a single fall history (no fall history: 3.9% vs 8.6%; single fall history: 10.2% vs 10.9%; history of recurrent falls: 16.5% vs 20.6%).Conclusions and implicationsSOF and FRAIL could provide some additional prediction value to fall history in older women but not men. FRAIL could be clinically useful in identifying older women at risk of recurrent falls, especially in those with a single fall history.
Keywords:Frailty  falls  screening  older adults
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号