首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

Pentacam眼前节分析仪和Keratron Scout角膜地形图仪测量瞳孔偏移量的对比研究
引用本文:徐英男,康培培,张森俊,薛劲松.Pentacam眼前节分析仪和Keratron Scout角膜地形图仪测量瞳孔偏移量的对比研究[J].国际眼科杂志,2020,20(8):1418-1421.
作者姓名:徐英男  康培培  张森俊  薛劲松
作者单位:210005 中国江苏省南京市,南京医科大学附属眼科医院;210005 中国江苏省南京市,南京医科大学附属眼科医院;210005 中国江苏省南京市,南京医科大学附属眼科医院;210005 中国江苏省南京市,南京医科大学附属眼科医院
基金项目:南京市医学科技发展项目(No.YKK17273)
摘    要:

目的:评价Pentacam眼前节分析仪和Keratron Scout角膜地形图仪测量瞳孔偏移量(pupillary offset)的差异和一致性。

方法:随机选取2017-11/2018-02在我院行准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)的患者311例604眼。术前应用Pentacam眼前节分析仪和Keratron Scout角膜地形图仪测量患者瞳孔偏移量,比较两种仪器测量结果的差异性和一致性。

结果:Pentacam眼前节分析仪和Keratron Scout角膜地形图仪测量的右眼、左眼、双眼总的offset值均有差异(P<0.05)。两种仪器测量的右眼、左眼、双眼offset轴向均无差异(P>0.05)。两种仪器测量的右眼offset值、offset轴向95%一致性界线(LoA)分别为-0.11~0.19mm、-157.01°~135.35°。左眼offset值、offset轴向95% LoA分别为-0.12~0.18mm、-150.16°~158.22°。双眼offset值、offset轴向95%LoA分别为-0.11~0.19mm、-154.30°~147.10°。

结论:Pentacam眼前节分析仪测量的瞳孔偏移量比Keratron Scout角膜地形图仪的测量值小,差异在临床可以接受的范围内。两种仪器均可以获得准确的瞳孔偏移量数据,可相互参考、校正和补充。

关 键 词:眼前节分析仪  Keratron  Scout角膜地形图仪  瞳孔偏移量  瞳孔大小  offset值  offset轴向
收稿时间:2019/12/24 0:00:00
修稿时间:2020/7/6 0:00:00

A comparative study on the measurement of pupillary offset by Pentacam anterior segment analyzer and Keratron Scout corneal topographer
Ying-Nan Xu,Pei-Pei Kang,Sen-Jun Zhang and Jin-Song Xue.A comparative study on the measurement of pupillary offset by Pentacam anterior segment analyzer and Keratron Scout corneal topographer[J].International Journal of Ophthalmology,2020,20(8):1418-1421.
Authors:Ying-Nan Xu  Pei-Pei Kang  Sen-Jun Zhang and Jin-Song Xue
Institution:The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210005, Jiangsu Province, China,The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210005, Jiangsu Province, China,The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210005, Jiangsu Province, China and The Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210005, Jiangsu Province, China
Abstract:AIM: To evaluate the difference and consistency of pupillary offset measured by the Pentacam anterior segment analyzer and Keratron Scout corneal topographer.

METHODS: Three hundred and eleven patients(604 eyes)who underwent excimer laser in situ keratomileusis from November 2017 to February 2018 were randomly selected. Before surgery, the pupillary offset values were measured by Pentacam and Keratron, and the differences and consistency of the values between the two instruments were compared.

RESULTS: The pupillary offset values of the right eyes, left eyes, and both eyes between Pentacam and Keratron were statistically different(P<0.05). There were no significant statistical differences in the offset orientations of right eyes, left eyes and both eyes between the two instruments(P>0.05). The 95% consistent line(LoA)of offset value and offset orientation in the right eyes, left eyes and both eyes between the two instruments were -0.11-0.19mm and -157.01°-135.35°, -0.12-0.18mm and -150.16°-158.22°, -0.11-0.19mm and -154.30°-147.10°, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The pupillary offset measured by the Pentacam was smaller than that measured by the Keratron, but the difference was within the clinically acceptable range. The accurate pupillary offset can be obtained, and be the mutual reference, correction and supplement in the both instruments.

Keywords:Pentacam anterior segment analyzer  Keratron Scout corneal topographer  pupillary offset  pupil size  offset value  offset axial
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号