首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

肝癌介入后根治性精准肝切除的临床应用
引用本文:何振兴,彭勇,段文涛,田云鸿,张健,胡韬,李永,杨红春,马海.肝癌介入后根治性精准肝切除的临床应用[J].川北医学院学报,2014,29(2):137-140.
作者姓名:何振兴  彭勇  段文涛  田云鸿  张健  胡韬  李永  杨红春  马海
作者单位:何振兴 (南充市中心医院·川北医学院附属第二临床学院肝胆胰外科,四川南充637000); 彭勇 (南充市中心医院·川北医学院附属第二临床学院肝胆胰外科,四川南充637000); 段文涛 (南充市中心医院·川北医学院附属第二临床学院肝胆胰外科,四川南充637000); 田云鸿 (南充市中心医院·川北医学院附属第二临床学院肝胆胰外科,四川南充637000); 张健 (南充市中心医院·川北医学院附属第二临床学院肝胆胰外科,四川南充637000); 胡韬 (南充市中心医院·川北医学院附属第二临床学院肝胆胰外科,四川南充637000); 李永 (南充市中心医院·川北医学院附属第二临床学院肝胆胰外科,四川南充637000); 杨红春 (南充市中心医院·川北医学院附属第二临床学院肝胆胰外科,四川南充637000); 马海 (南充市中心医院·川北医学院附属第二临床学院肝胆胰外科,四川南充637000);
基金项目:四川省教育厅青年基金项目(项目编号:12ZB042)
摘    要:目的:探讨根治性精准肝切除在肝癌介入后病例中应用的优势。方法:回顾性分析我院2005年1月至2012年12月间,肝癌介入治疗后行肝癌切除病例68例,其中采用传统Pringle法肝门阻断的肝切除术30例,根治性精准肝切除38例,比较两组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后肝功能损害、术后并发症及住院时间方面的差别。结果:根治性精准肝切除组手术时间(314.5±51.2)min长于Pringle法肝切除组(221.4±33.8)min,P<0.05。但根治性精准肝切除组较Pringle法肝切除组,术中出血少(375.4±76.8)vs(596.1±107.3)mL,P<0.05];术后肝功能损害轻,术后第3天,ALT:(311.7±44.3)vs(575.6±67.3)]U/L;AST:(172.3±35.7)vs(443.7±40.3)]U/L;TD:(41.2±13.2)vs(50.9±19.7)]μmol/L,差别均P<0.05;术后并发症发生率低(2/38,5.26%)比(8/30,26.67%),P<0.05;住院时间短(16.4±2.6)vs(22.7±5.1)]d,P<0.05。结论:根治性精准肝切除运用于肝癌介入后病例中,相对传统Pringle法肝门阻断肝切除术有着术中出血少、肝功能损害轻、并发症发生率低、住院时间短的优势。

关 键 词:精准肝切除  肝癌  介入治疗

Clinical application of radical precise hepatectomy for liver cancer after interventional therapy
HE Zhen-xing,PENG Yong,DUAN Wen-tao,TIAN Yun-hong,ZHANG Jian,HU Tao,LI Yong,YANG Hong-chun,MA Hai.Clinical application of radical precise hepatectomy for liver cancer after interventional therapy[J].Journal of North Sichuan Medical College,2014,29(2):137-140.
Authors:HE Zhen-xing  PENG Yong  DUAN Wen-tao  TIAN Yun-hong  ZHANG Jian  HU Tao  LI Yong  YANG Hong-chun  MA Hai
Institution:(Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department ,Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Hospital of North Sichuan Medical Col lege, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, China )
Abstract:Objective:To discuss the advantage of radical precise hepatectomy of liver cancers after interventional therapy. Methods: Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 68 patients who had received hepatectomy of liver cancers after interventiona] therapy in our hospital during Jan. 2005 to Dec. 2012;Radical precise hepatectomy were performed in 38 cases (precise hepatectomy group)and the traditional pringle maneuver for liver portal triad clamping were performed in 30 cases (pringle clamping group). Then the surgery time, blood loss, postoperative liver function impair, complications, hospital stays between the precise hepateetomy group and pringle clamping group were compared. Results:The surgery time of the precise hepatectomy group was longer than the pringle clamping group(314. 5 ± 51.2rain vs 221.4 ± 33.8rain P 〈 0. 05 ). But compared with the pringle clamping group,the precise hepatectomy group had less blood loss(375.4±76.8ml vs 596. 1 ± 107.3ml,P 〈0. 05) ,less postoperative liver function impair(on 3rd day after operation,ALT:311.7 ±44. 3U/L VS 575.6 ±67.3U/L;AST:172.3 +35.7U/L vs 443.7 ±40. 3U/L;TD:41.2 ±13.2pLmol/L vs 50. 9 ± 19. 7μmol/L,P 〈 0.05) ,less complications( 2/38,5.26% vs 8/30,26.67% , P 〈 0. 05 ) and less hospital stays ( 16.4 ± 2. 6d vs 22. 7 ± 5. ld, P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion:For patients with liver cancers after interventional therapy, radical precise hepatectomy shows more advantages com- pared with traditional tingle clamping hepatectomy in blood loss,postoperative liver function impair,complications and hospital stays.
Keywords:
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号