首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Heterogeneity and Classification of Recent Onset Psychosis and Depression: A Multimodal Machine Learning Approach
Authors:Paris Alexandros Lalousis  Stephen J Wood  Lianne Schmaal  Katharine Chisholm  Sian Lowri Griffiths  Renate L E P Reniers  Alessandro Bertolino  Stefan Borgwardt  Paolo Brambilla  Joseph Kambeitz  Rebekka Lencer  Christos Pantelis  Stephan Ruhrmann  Raimo K R Salokangas  Frauke Schultze-Lutter  Carolina Bonivento  Dominic Dwyer  Adele Ferro  Theresa Haidl  Marlene Rosen  Andre Schmidt  Eva Meisenzahl  Nikolaos Koutsouleris  Rachel Upthegrove  PRONIA Consortium
Abstract:
Diagnostic heterogeneity within and across psychotic and affective disorders challenges accurate treatment selection, particularly in the early stages. Delineation of shared and distinct illness features at the phenotypic and brain levels may inform the development of more precise differential diagnostic tools. We aimed to identify prototypes of depression and psychosis to investigate their heterogeneity, with common, comorbid transdiagnostic symptoms. Analyzing clinical/neurocognitive and grey matter volume (GMV) data from the PRONIA database, we generated prototypic models of recent-onset depression (ROD) vs. recent-onset psychosis (ROP) by training support-vector machines to separate patients with ROD from patients with ROP, who were selected for absent comorbid features (pure groups). Then, models were applied to patients with comorbidity, ie, ROP with depressive symptoms (ROP+D) and ROD participants with sub-threshold psychosis-like features (ROD+P), to measure their positions within the affective-psychotic continuum. All models were independently validated in a replication sample. Comorbid patients were positioned between pure groups, with ROP+D patients being more frequently classified as ROD compared to pure ROP patients (clinical/neurocognitive model: χ2 = 14.874; P < .001; GMV model: χ2 = 4.933; P = .026). ROD+P patient classification did not differ from ROD (clinical/neurocognitive model: χ2 = 1.956; P = 0.162; GMV model: χ2 = 0.005; P = .943). Clinical/neurocognitive and neuroanatomical models demonstrated separability of prototypic depression from psychosis. The shift of comorbid patients toward the depression prototype, observed at the clinical and biological levels, suggests that psychosis with affective comorbidity aligns more strongly to depressive rather than psychotic disease processes. Future studies should assess how these quantitative measures of comorbidity predict outcomes and individual responses to stratified therapeutic interventions.
Keywords:psychosis   depression   transdiagnostic   machine learning   MRI   gray matter volume   comorbidity
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号