首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

水囊肝周填塞和传统纱布填塞在损伤控制性手术治疗严重肝外伤中的疗效对比
引用本文:李群华,邓孙林,陈秀友,霍瑞君,盘毅辉,刘凯. 水囊肝周填塞和传统纱布填塞在损伤控制性手术治疗严重肝外伤中的疗效对比[J]. 现代保健, 2014, 0(21): 13-16
作者姓名:李群华  邓孙林  陈秀友  霍瑞君  盘毅辉  刘凯
作者单位:广东省东莞市中堂医院,广东东莞523220
基金项目:东莞市医疗卫生单位科技项目(201310515000214)
摘    要:
目的:探讨如何提高严重肝外伤的抢救成功率。方法:回顾性分析2003年7月-2014年3月在本院诊治的采用损伤控制性手术的25例严重肝外伤的临床资料,根据不同的填塞方法将所有患者分成传统纱布填塞组14例和水囊肝周填塞组11例,观察比较两组患者的死亡率、再次出血率、再次手术率和并发症等差异。结果:水囊肝周填塞组的死亡率、再出血率、再手术率及并发症发生率均明显低于传统纱布填塞组,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:严重肝外伤采用损伤控制性手术治疗时,自制水囊肝周填塞压迫止血效果显著,操作简单,是一种较为实用的止血方法,值得临床推广。

关 键 词:自制水囊  纱布填塞  肝外伤  损伤控制

Effect Comparison of the Water Sac Surrounding Liver Packing and Traditional Gauze Packing in Damage Control Operation for Severe Liver Injury
Affiliation:LI Qun-hua, DENG Sun-Un, CHEN Xiu-you, et al.
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate how to improve the success rate of rescue of severe liver trauma. Method : The clinical data of 25 patients with severe liver trauma who were treated with damage control surgery in our hospital from July 2003 to March 2014 were retrospective analyzed, according to the different packing method, they were divided into the traditional gauze packing group for 14 cases and the water sac perihepatic packing group for 11 cases.The rebleeding rate, mortality, reoperation rate and complications of the two groups were observed and compared.Result: The mortality, rebleeding rate, reoperation rate and incidence of complications in the water sac perihepatic packing group were significantly lower than those in the traditional gauze packing group, the differences were statistically significant ( P〈0.05 ) .Conclusion: When severe liver trauma with damage control surgery, the self-made water bursa of peripheral hepatic tamping compression hemostasis effect is remarkable, the operation is simple, is a more practical method of bleeding, is worthy of clinical promotion.
Keywords:Self-made water bursa  Gauze packing  Liver injury  Damage control
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号