正向、反向束间构型在前十字韧带双束重建中的临床效果比较

 目的比较关节镜下前十字韧带(anterior cruciate ligament. ACL)双束重建中正向、反向束间构型的初期临床效果。方法 2008年 4月至 2009年 8月.采用 8股自体腘绳肌肌腱双束重建 ACL治疗单纯 ACL损伤患者 97例.根据患者入: 时住: 号的奇偶数随机分成正向组(采用正向束间构型. 47例)和反向组(采用反向束间构型.50例).移植物均采用微型钢板纽扣进行悬吊式固定。术后患者随访期均超过 1年.根据 IKDC、Lysholm和 Tegner评分标准进行膝关节功能评估。结果术后随访 12~17个月.平均(13.71±1.32)个月。末次随访时.正向组 2例(4.2%)患者伸膝活动受限 10°.5例(10.6%)膝关节轻度屈曲受限(均<15°);反向组所有患者伸膝活动正常.4例(8.0%)屈曲受限约 5°。根据 Lachman试验.正向组 1例(2.1%)I度阳性和 1例(2.1%) II 度阳性.反向组 1例(2.0%) II 度阳性。 KT-1000(屈膝 30°.30N)双膝松弛度差异值正向组为(1.04±1.11) mm.反向组为(0.86±1.12) mm。按照 IKDC客观评级标准.正向组 46例(97.9%)正常或接近正常.反向组 48例(96.0%)正常或接近正常。根据 IKDC、 Lysholm和 Tegner评分标准.两组的差异均无统计学意义。结论采用 8股自体腘绳肌肌腱正向、反向束间构型双束重建 ACL均能有效地恢复膝关节稳定性.两组短期临床效果的差异无统计学意义。但反向束间构型能有效地防止移植物和髁间凹的撞击。

Forward versus reverse anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction: a prospective study

Objective To evaluate and compare the clinical effects of forward and reverse anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction through the arthroscopy. Methods From April 2008 to August 2009,97 cases with simple ACL injures were treated with eight strands of hamstring tendons in way of two-bundle and four-tunnel reconstruction. The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the number of hospital admissions: odd numbers (A group, 47 cases) were treated with forward double-bundle reconstruction and even (B group,50 cases) were treated with reverse. The grafts were fixed with a suspension technique by mini-plates and mini-buttons. Mean follow-up exceeded one year. The function of knee joint were assessed by the IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner rating scale. Results Mean follow-up was 13.71 months.At the last follow-up, 2 patients in A group had a 10°extension deformity and 5 had a less than 15° flexion limitation. All patients in B group showed normal knee extension, and 4 had a 5° flexion limitation. According to Lachman test, there were one case with one plus positive and one with two plus positive in A group,and one with two plus in B. KT-1000 examination (30° flexion and 30 N) showed the side to side mean difference of anterior knee laxity was (1.04±1.11) mm in A group and (0.86±1.12)mm in B. According to objective IKDC evaluation, the results were graded as normal or nearly normal in 46 patients in A group and 48in B. There were no statistical differences in the IKDC, Lysholm, and Teguer scores between two groups.Conclusion Forward or reverse ACL double-bundle reconstruction with eight strands of hamstring tendons can both restore knee stability, and there is no significant deviation between the two techniques.