首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

中医药综合方案提高根治术后小肝癌患者生存率回顾性队列研究
引用本文:孙振,崔珺,朱役,梁水庭,王忠,陈兴东,穆小苏,向维,覃晓,徐静,翟笑枫,张院辉,郎庆波,吴美京.中医药综合方案提高根治术后小肝癌患者生存率回顾性队列研究[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2014(12):63-66.
作者姓名:孙振  崔珺  朱役  梁水庭  王忠  陈兴东  穆小苏  向维  覃晓  徐静  翟笑枫  张院辉  郎庆波  吴美京
作者单位:南京军区南京总医院疗养区;中国石化管道储运分公司南京输油处;广西医科大学第一附属医院;第二军医大学附属长海医院中医系;第二军医大学卫勤系卫生统计学教研室
基金项目:中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2012M521937);江苏省博士后科研资助计划项目(1201024C);江苏省“333”工程课题(BRA2012232);南京军区南京总医院疗养区科研课题(2013075)
摘    要:目的:本研究评价中医药综合方案治疗根治术后小肝癌的疗效。方法:对2005年1月—2008年12月在广西医科大学第一附属医院行根治术的小肝癌患者161例纳入回顾性队列分析,其中53例接受中医药综合方案治疗(TCM组),80例接受介入疗法(TACE组),20例接受中医药和介入疗法(TCM-IT组),8例单纯手术治疗(SO),以无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)为观察指标,Kaplan-Meier方法统计分析各组总生存率和无病生存率。结果:共纳入161例小肝癌患者,12例失访,失访率7.45%,其中TCM组第1年、2年、3年总生存率分别为91.5%、84.8%、84.8%;介入组1年、2年,3年总生存率分别为91%、85.5%、60.5%,有明显统计学差异(P=0.008);TCM与介入联合组和单纯手术组中位生存期分别是30.667个月和29.267个月。TCM组1年、2年的无病生存率分别为84.5%、81.7%,介入组1年、2年的无病生存率为83.9%、76.5%,无统计学差异(P=0.461)。结论:中医药综合治疗方案与TACE介入治疗术相比,在提高根治术后小肝癌患者的生存率方面具有优势,其结果有待于进一步前瞻性随机对照研究验证。

关 键 词:原发性肝癌  介入治疗  中医药  回顾性队列研究

Traditional Chinese Medicine in Improving Overall Survival Rates for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Institution:SUN Zhen, CUI Jun, ZHU Yi, LIANG Shuiting, WANG Zhong, CHEN Xingdong, MU Xiaosu, XIANG Wei , QIN Xiao, XU Jing, ZHAI Xiaofeng, ZHANG Yuanhui, LANG Qingbo, WU Meijing ( 1. Department of Sanitarium Area, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command of PLA, Nanjing 211131, Jiangsu, China; 2. Nanjing Oil Transporta Tion Department of SINOPEC Pipeline Storage and Transportation Company, Nanjing 210046, Jiangsu, China; 3. First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Jiangsu, China; 4. Changhai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; 5.Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China )
Abstract:Objective : To investigate the therapeutic effects of a comprehensive individualized treatment program using TCM for small hepatocellular carcinoma after resection. Methods: In this trial, a total of 161 patients who stayed in First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University were enrolled from January 2005 to December 2008. 53 patients were treated with a TCM-only ( TCM ) group. 80 patients were treated with an transarterial ehemoembolization-only ( TACE ) group. 20 patients were treated with a TCM combined with interventional therapy ( TCM-IT ) group. 8 patients were treated with patients were treated with a simple operation ( SO ) group. Disease free survival ( DFS ) and overall survival ( OS ) were the observation indexes. Prognostic factors were correlated with OS rates and ( DFS ) rates, which calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results : The overall loss to follow-up rate was 14.0% ( 12/161 ). The Overall survival (OS)rates at 1,2, and 3 years of TCM patients were 91.5%,84.8% and 84.8%. The Overall survival ( OS )rates at 1,2 and 3 years of TACE group patients were 91%, 85.5%, 60.5%. There was significant difference in survival time between the two groups ( P=0.008 ). The overall median survival time in TCM combined with interventional therapy ( TCM-IT )was 30.667 months and simple operation ( SO ) group was 29.267 months. The Disease free survival ( DFS )rates at 1,2 years of TCMO patients were 84.5% and 81.7%. The DFS rates at 1,2 years of ITO patients were 83.9% and 76.5%. There was no significantdifference in survival time between the two groups ( P=0.461 ). Conclusions : In comparison with TACE therapy, the comprehensive individualized treatment program using TCM for small hepatocellular carcinoma after resection may improve overall survival for small- HCC after resection. However, these findings need to be confirmed in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Keywords:hepatocellular carcinoma  interventional therapy  herbal therapy  traditional Chinese medicine  retrospective cohort study
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号