首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

颈椎前路减压融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的技术特点
引用本文:王荣茂,林翔,石树培,修忠标,林信民,朱玮. 颈椎前路减压融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的技术特点[J]. 福建中医学院学报, 2008, 18(5)
作者姓名:王荣茂  林翔  石树培  修忠标  林信民  朱玮
作者单位:福建中医学院附属人民医院,福建,福州,350004
摘    要:
目的 比较3种术式颈椎前路减压融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的技术特点. 方法 采用环锯法前路减压髂骨移植、问盘切除PEEK颈椎融合器植骨融合、椎体次全切除减压钛网重建3种术式.施行颈椎前路减压融合治疗脊髓型颈椎病45例,所有病例用钛钢板内固定. 结果 JOA术前平均9.02分,术后改善率70.47%,优良率达84.45%. 结论 3种术式技术特点不同.适用于不同情况,只要使用得当,均有较好的疗效.

关 键 词:脊髓型颈椎病  颈椎融合器  前路减压  钛网

Study on Different Methods of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Cervical Spondylosis Myelopathy
WANG Rong-mao,LIN Xiang,SHI Shu-pei,et al. Study on Different Methods of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Cervical Spondylosis Myelopathy[J]. Journal of Fujian College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2008, 18(5)
Authors:WANG Rong-mao  LIN Xiang  SHI Shu-pei  et al
Abstract:
Objective To study the different methods of cervical anterior decompression and fusion in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods 45 cases of CSM were operated by Cloward's decompression, Smith-Robinson dics decompression and PEEK cage fusion, ACF decompression and titanium surgical mesh fusion respectively, all cases were fixed by titanium plate. Results The average preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was 9.02 points, the postoperative recovery rate was 70.47%, and the excellent rate was 84.45%. Conclusion Three methods of cervical anterior decompression and fusion have better effect, but they are suitable for diffirent indications.
Keywords:cervical spondylotic myelopathy  cervical fusion cage  anterior decompression  titanium surgical mesh
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号