首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

葛根素注射液所致临床发热反应的系统评价
引用本文:徐俊,许颖琦,邓海欣,黄思超,钟劲松,蔡绍晖.葛根素注射液所致临床发热反应的系统评价[J].现代食品与药品杂志,2014(3):152-156.
作者姓名:徐俊  许颖琦  邓海欣  黄思超  钟劲松  蔡绍晖
作者单位:[1]广州暨南大学医学院,广东广州510632 [2]广州暨南大学药学院,广东广州510632 [3]珠海市人民医院药学部,广东珠海519000
基金项目:基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年基金(编号:81202461)国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:81273538)
摘    要:目的在治疗心脑血管疾病方面,评价葛根素注射液与发热反应的相关性。方法计算机检索Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、EMbase、Pubmed、CBM、WanFang Data和CNKI(至2013年8月)中有关葛根素注射液与发热相关性的临床试验,并手工检索相关研究及其参考文献。根据纳入和排除标准选择纳入文献、提取资料和进行方法学质量评价。在此基础上,以不良反应发生率为指标,利用系统评价的方法考察葛根素注射液与发热的相关性。结果依据纳入排除标准共纳入8项随机对照临床研究。结果显示,葛根素注射液组整体的不良反应发生率为1.20%,提示发热为葛根素注射液的常见不良反应。进一步的亚组分析结果显示,天保康葛根素注射液未见发热反应;普润葛根素注射液的发热反应发生率为0.90%,为偶见不良反应;其他产家的葛根素注射液的发热反应发生率为5.13%,为常见不良反应。葛根素注射液的发热反应发生率从2005年之前的4.04%降至2005年之后的0.32%。结论发热为葛根素注射液不良反应,除药物本身因素外,该不良反应与葛根素注射液的制备工艺具有一定的相关性。

关 键 词:葛根素注射液  发热  临床研究  不良反应  系统评价

Relationship between Puerarin Injections and Its Clinical Fever Reaction. A Systematic Review
XU Jun,XU Ying-qi,DENG Hai-xin,HUANG Si-chao,ZHONG Jin-song,CAI Shao-hui.Relationship between Puerarin Injections and Its Clinical Fever Reaction. A Systematic Review[J].JOurnal of Modern Food and Pharmaceuticals,2014(3):152-156.
Authors:XU Jun  XU Ying-qi  DENG Hai-xin  HUANG Si-chao  ZHONG Jin-song  CAI Shao-hui
Institution:1. College of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangcong 510632, China; 2. College of pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510652, China; 3. Department of Pharmacy, Zhuhai People's Hospital, Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000, China)
Abstract:Objective To assess the relationship between puerarin injections and its clinical fever reaction in the treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Methods The published clinical studies of puerarin injections were searched in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMbase, Pubmed, CBM, WanFang and CNKI (to August, 2013) as well as the further evaluation of references cited by target clinical studies to get sufficient evidences. Based on the suitable standards, the valid clinical studies were taken into further assessment followed by the extraction of information. Afterwards, the rate of adverse reaction was chosen as an index to estimate the relationship between puerarin injection and its clinical fever adverse reaction by fixed effect model and subgroup analysis. Results Eight clinical studies were considered to be effective evidences to assess the relationship between puerarin injection and its clinical fever reaction. Fixed effect model revealed that the rate of fever reaction was 1.20%, belonging to common adverse reaction. However, the subgroup analysis indicates that, in this study, the puerarin injections with unknown manufacturer had 5.13% of fever reaction comparing with 0.90% for Pu Run and none for Tian Baokang whose rates of adverse reaction were considered to be rare and none at present. In addition, more clinical fever reactions were reported before 2005 (4.04%) than after 2005 adverse reaction of puerarin technology and method. (0.32%) according to the comparison of rates. Conclusion Fever is injections, and also the rate of its fever reaction can be greatly affected characterized as an by the preparation
Keywords:Puerarin injections  fever  clinical research  adverse reaction  systematic review
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号