首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Clinicians' reporting of suspected child abuse: A review of the empirical literature
Affiliation:1. Keio Economic Observatory (KEO), Keio University, Tokyo, Japan;2. Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI), Tokyo, Japan;3. Faculty of Economics, Rissho University, Tokyo, Japan;4. National Economic, Accounts, United States Bureau of Economic Analysis, Suitland, MD, United States;5. Institute of Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
Abstract:
Although psychologists are mandated by law to report suspected child abuse, large numbers of clinicians have been found to comply inconsistently with reporting laws. A variety of factors have been shown to influence clinicians' child abuse reporting. When placed within the context of a comprehensive decision-making model, these factors explain willingness to report suspected child abuse. Legal requirements, clinician characteristics, and situational dimensions have all been found to interact to influence child abuse reporting decisions. A review of the child abuse reporting literature suggests that practitioners may take effective action toward increasing compliance with mandatory reporting laws while minimizing potential disruption to treatment. Implications for public policy, practice, and suggestions for further research are offered.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号